 |
Using Technology with Political Texts to Develop Critical Thinking Skills
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
1
Using Technology with Political Texts to Develop Critical Thinking Skills Robert Webking Department of Political Science, University of Texas at El Paso Felix Valenzuela Yale Law School
We began using audience response systems in political science classes in 1998.
Since then, we have made extensive use of three different systems: we began with a system called Classtalk, a hardwired system that uses graphing calculators as response pads for students, and have also used the wireless Classroom Performance System. In addition we have created our own system, “Cephalus,” which uses wireless networks and computers, or pocket PCs, as input devices for students. At the time we started with Classtalk, the system had been used primarily in science classes, and there was little information on using these systems in social science and humanities classes. Since then, we have used them extensively and discovered exciting ways to help students develop their analytical skills with the help of these tools. Simple things
Audience response systems are especially helpful in large lecture classes in a
couple of ways that become immediately apparent upon recognizing what the technology allows. Since the systems simplify record keeping for large numbers of students, they make it easy to check on attendance and participation. The ability to ask the students questions frequently and to have them respond helps to address the problems of anonymity and passivity in large lecture settings, involving each student more actively in each day’s class. Moreover, frequently asking questions can help the lecturer to understand whether explanations have been grasped with clarity, or whether, on the contrary, it is advisable to explain the course's problems or issues more thoroughly or from a different perspective. Active Participation
A great advantage to using an audience response system, especially in larger
lecture classes, but also in smaller classes, is that it makes each student continually active in working with the material and the lecturer. With each question, each student in the class is “on the spot” and required to make an assessment in order to answer. The temptation to sit back and listen—or not listen and do one’s calculus homework or surf the Internet—that is so easily given into in the large impersonal lecture hall must be resisted in order to fulfill the requirements for the course. As in many cases, the short term motive of grades can provide the initial reason for attention and participation, perhaps culturing a genuine interest in the material that might offer a more sophisticated and mature motive.
It is sometimes suggested that an advantage of these systems is that they
encourage participation by students who would not ordinarily participate readily because
|
| | Authors: Webking, Robert. and Valenzuela, Felix. |
|
| |
|
|
1
Using Technology with Political Texts to Develop Critical Thinking Skills Robert Webking Department of Political Science, University of Texas at El Paso Felix Valenzuela Yale Law School
We began using audience response systems in political science classes in 1998.
Since then, we have made extensive use of three different systems: we began with a system called Classtalk, a hardwired system that uses graphing calculators as response pads for students, and have also used the wireless Classroom Performance System. In addition we have created our own system, “Cephalus,” which uses wireless networks and computers, or pocket PCs, as input devices for students. At the time we started with Classtalk, the system had been used primarily in science classes, and there was little information on using these systems in social science and humanities classes. Since then, we have used them extensively and discovered exciting ways to help students develop their analytical skills with the help of these tools. Simple things
Audience response systems are especially helpful in large lecture classes in a
couple of ways that become immediately apparent upon recognizing what the technology allows. Since the systems simplify record keeping for large numbers of students, they make it easy to check on attendance and participation. The ability to ask the students questions frequently and to have them respond helps to address the problems of anonymity and passivity in large lecture settings, involving each student more actively in each day’s class. Moreover, frequently asking questions can help the lecturer to understand whether explanations have been grasped with clarity, or whether, on the contrary, it is advisable to explain the course's problems or issues more thoroughly or from a different perspective. Active Participation
A great advantage to using an audience response system, especially in larger
lecture classes, but also in smaller classes, is that it makes each student continually active in working with the material and the lecturer. With each question, each student in the class is “on the spot” and required to make an assessment in order to answer. The temptation to sit back and listen—or not listen and do one’s calculus homework or surf the Internet—that is so easily given into in the large impersonal lecture hall must be resisted in order to fulfill the requirements for the course. As in many cases, the short term motive of grades can provide the initial reason for attention and participation, perhaps culturing a genuine interest in the material that might offer a more sophisticated and mature motive.
It is sometimes suggested that an advantage of these systems is that they
encourage participation by students who would not ordinarily participate readily because
|
|
Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|