All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Research-as-Service Projects for Large Introductory Courses
Unformatted Document Text:  18 observations of the project led us to find a similar phenomenon. Those who were service-driven prior to the project or at least willing to help others were more likely to appreciate the project. The same could be said for those with a strong work ethic. To test if this was a general pattern, I gave students a list of 10 traits and asked them to indicate how well people who know them well would answer. Students then indicated a score from 1 (“Does not have trait”) to 5 (“Has trait). The first five traits were intended to tap a set of compassionate traits; the next five were to measure the work ethic of the student. Table 1 shows the results of a factor analysis of the ten items. I find that there are three latent traits measured by the items. The first is a “compassion traits” variable which is composed of the first five items. The remaining do not tap one but two sets of traits. The first is intelligence (albeit perceived) and the second is a “hardworking trait.” I use the factor loadings to create two variables: compassion and hardworking. I expect that students that are compassionate or hardworking are more likely to find the project beneficial than those who lack these traits. [Insert Table 1 About Here] I also expect that the type of team that the student was in should affect their evaluations. Only two of the teams worked well (Team 2 and Team 8). Students in this team experienced the type of research-as-service project that is expected to benefit students. Other teams—the “satisfactory” or “ugly”—lacked one or more of the major components of a good research-as-service team. For some, there was little research. For others, the team was a complete failure. For others, the lack of support by the community organization led to such disorganization that the experience was ruined. Students in these teams should have a much more negative reaction than those in the “good teams” that had the right experience. In addition, I include a measure of whether the student completed the volunteer hours required by the project. If students who completed the hours are more positive about the experience, then it suggests that the experience was positive if one completed it and that opposition is more likely to come from those

Authors: Grant, J..
first   previous   Page 19 of 33   next   last



background image
18
observations of the project led us to find a similar phenomenon. Those who were service-driven prior to
the project or at least willing to help others were more likely to appreciate the project. The same could be
said for those with a strong work ethic.
To test if this was a general pattern, I gave students a list of 10 traits and asked them to indicate
how well people who know them well would answer. Students then indicated a score from 1 (“Does not
have trait”) to 5 (“Has trait). The first five traits were intended to tap a set of compassionate traits; the
next five were to measure the work ethic of the student. Table 1 shows the results of a factor analysis of
the ten items. I find that there are three latent traits measured by the items. The first is a “compassion
traits” variable which is composed of the first five items. The remaining do not tap one but two sets of
traits. The first is intelligence (albeit perceived) and the second is a “hardworking trait.” I use the factor
loadings to create two variables: compassion and hardworking. I expect that students that are
compassionate or hardworking are more likely to find the project beneficial than those who lack these
traits.
[Insert Table 1 About Here]
I also expect that the type of team that the student was in should affect their evaluations. Only
two of the teams worked well (Team 2 and Team 8). Students in this team experienced the type of
research-as-service project that is expected to benefit students. Other teams—the “satisfactory” or
“ugly”—lacked one or more of the major components of a good research-as-service team. For some,
there was little research. For others, the team was a complete failure. For others, the lack of support by
the community organization led to such disorganization that the experience was ruined. Students in these
teams should have a much more negative reaction than those in the “good teams” that had the right
experience.
In addition, I include a measure of whether the student completed the volunteer hours required by
the project. If students who completed the hours are more positive about the experience, then it suggests
that the experience was positive if one completed it and that opposition is more likely to come from those


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 33   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.