All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

“Secrets of the SAT”: A Multifaceted Approach to Teaching Race and Affirmative Action
Unformatted Document Text:  Light and Rand, p.3 Introduction Here at the University of North Dakota (UND), as across the country, affirmative action is a contentious and controversial issue, even after the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the use of race-conscious university admissions policies in Grutter v. Bollinger. 1 Teaching subjects related to race at a school like UND presents particular challenges and sheds light on the varying practicalities of the Court’s diversity rationale in Grutter. Most UND students are from North Dakota, a state whose population is over 92% white, and many white students come to UND with little or no contact with people of color. As a result, few have given much thought to or see the inherent value of student-body diversity along racial or ethnic lines. In our Constitutional Law courses (Light’s in the Department of Political Science and Public Administration; Rand’s at the School of Law), we use affirmative action in university admissions following Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 2 as a case study of the interrelationship of constitutional interpretation and public policy implementation. Together, we have developed an integrated approach, drawing on individual and group activities, PBS’ Frontline documentary Secrets of the SAT and its companion web page, 3 an overview of the history of affirmative action and university admissions, and, of course, the case law. The teaching module revolves around a group exercise we have developed to help students begin to question common assumptions about race and affirmative action through discussion in a structured, peer-led context. Our central purposes in this paper are to provide other instructors with the opportunity to adapt this module for use in their own classrooms, and to discuss how our experiences in using 1 ___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 2325 (2003); see also Gratz v. Bollinger, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 2411 (2003). 2 438 U.S. 265 (1978). 3 See Frontline, Secrets of the SAT (PBS television broadcast, fall 1999) [hereinafter Secrets of the SAT video]; Frontline, Secrets of the SAT, at <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/> (last visited Mar. 10, 2004) [hereinafter Secrets of the SAT web site].

Authors: Light, Steven. and Rand, Kathryn.
first   previous   Page 3 of 33   next   last



background image
Light and Rand, p.3
Introduction
Here at the University of North Dakota (UND), as across the country, affirmative action
is a contentious and controversial issue, even after the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision
upholding the use of race-conscious university admissions policies in Grutter v. Bollinger.
1
Teaching subjects related to race at a school like UND presents particular challenges and sheds
light on the varying practicalities of the Court’s diversity rationale in Grutter. Most UND
students are from North Dakota, a state whose population is over 92% white, and many white
students come to UND with little or no contact with people of color. As a result, few have given
much thought to or see the inherent value of student-body diversity along racial or ethnic lines.
In our Constitutional Law courses (Light’s in the Department of Political Science and
Public Administration; Rand’s at the School of Law), we use affirmative action in university
admissions following Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
2
as a case study of the
interrelationship of constitutional interpretation and public policy implementation. Together, we
have developed an integrated approach, drawing on individual and group activities, PBS’
Frontline documentary Secrets of the SAT and its companion web page,
3
an overview of the
history of affirmative action and university admissions, and, of course, the case law. The
teaching module revolves around a group exercise we have developed to help students begin to
question common assumptions about race and affirmative action through discussion in a
structured, peer-led context.
Our central purposes in this paper are to provide other instructors with the opportunity to
adapt this module for use in their own classrooms, and to discuss how our experiences in using
1
___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 2325 (2003); see also Gratz v. Bollinger, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 2411 (2003).
2
438 U.S. 265 (1978).
3
See Frontline, Secrets of the SAT (PBS television broadcast, fall 1999) [hereinafter Secrets of the SAT video];
Frontline, Secrets of the SAT, at <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/> (last visited Mar. 10,
2004) [hereinafter Secrets of the SAT web site].


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 33   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.