All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Promoting Outcomes Assessment in Political Science Departments: The Role of Strategic Planning
Unformatted Document Text:  26 APPENDIX V Critical Thinking Rubric for Political Science Assignments at Elizabethtown College January 2005 To demonstrate A-level critical thinking skill in political science, a student consistently does all or almost all of the following: 1a. Gathers and recalls relevant facts, trends, events, chronologies, historical trends and context 2a. Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions 3a. Develops and presents argument or thesis clearly, providing concrete examples, clear logic and sound reasoning 4a. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con 5a. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view 6a. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions, making appropriate inferences from data and identifying key causal factors and effects 7a. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead 8a. Applies concepts, results or conclusions to new areas, imaginatively exploring implications, consequences, lessons to be learned and/or providing informed recommendations B-level work involves doing all or nearly all of 1 through 7 above, but showing little imagination or insight C-level work involves a student who consistently does some of 1 through 8 above, but who also does some of the following: 1b. Overlooks relevant facts, trends, events, provides insufficient awareness of historical context 2b. Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions 3b. Provides unclear or nonexistent argument or thesis statement, unsupported by evidence, logic, and reasoning 4b. Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments 5b. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view, constructs “straw man” alternatives 6b. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions, misses key causal variables, dwells on one or few factor(s) 7b. Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views based on self- interest or pre-conceptions 8b. Fails to apply concepts, results or conclusions to new areas, lacks insight about the implications or consequences, provides no reasoned recommendations D-level work involves a student consistently doing most or many of 1b through 8b above. F-level work involves a student consistently doing all or nearly all of 1b through 8b above.

Authors: McClellan, E. Fletcher.
first   previous   Page 26 of 26   next   last



background image
26
APPENDIX V
Critical Thinking Rubric for Political Science Assignments at Elizabethtown College
January 2005
To demonstrate A-level critical thinking skill in political science, a student consistently
does all or almost all of the following:
1a. Gathers and recalls relevant facts, trends, events, chronologies, historical trends
and context
2a. Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions
3a. Develops and presents argument or thesis clearly, providing concrete examples,
clear logic and sound reasoning
4a. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con
5a. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view
6a. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions, making appropriate
inferences from data and identifying key causal factors and effects
7a. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead
8a. Applies concepts, results or conclusions to new areas, imaginatively exploring
implications, consequences, lessons to be learned and/or providing
informed recommendations

B-level work involves doing all or nearly all of 1 through 7 above, but showing little
imagination or insight

C-level work involves a student who consistently does some of 1 through 8 above, but
who also does some of the following:
1b. Overlooks relevant facts, trends, events, provides insufficient awareness of
historical context
2b. Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions
3b. Provides unclear or nonexistent argument or thesis statement, unsupported by
evidence, logic, and reasoning
4b. Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments
5b. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view, constructs
“straw man” alternatives
6b. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions, misses key causal variables, dwells
on one or few factor(s)
7b. Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views based on self-
interest or pre-conceptions
8b. Fails to apply concepts, results or conclusions to new areas, lacks insight about
the implications or consequences, provides no reasoned recommendations

D-level work involves a student consistently doing most or many of 1b through 8b above.

F-level work involves a student consistently doing all or nearly all of 1b through 8b
above.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 26 of 26   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.