All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Beyond the Runaway Trolley: Thought Experiments in Political Theory
Unformatted Document Text:  9 matrixes of distribution. 8 In the original pie game, one player is assigned to cut the pie, and the other is told to choose the slice. There is pressure, then, to arrive at judgments that take equality as a default position in debates about distributing benefits and burdens. I want to expand this idea to cover a broader range of cases where we assess two outcomes, as in Divided World: (1) Half at 100 (2) Half at 200 (2) Everyone at 145 In this case, we are to imagine that the two halves of the world’s population are unaware of each other’s existence. On reflection, many hold that (1) may be better than (2), for people are better off on average. Others respond that (1) is worse, since the inequality in (1) bears no causal relation to welfare of those in (2). This method asks for our verdicts about states of affairs. But this may ignore the point of view of actual political agents, who are tasked with producing these end states. It suggests one worry that we might raise about Pie Cases. Perhaps they are overly concerned with how things look from the moral point of view of an omnipotent political engineer, capable of willing end states. What this method bypasses is a sustained reflection on the process of how goods ought to be distributed. This stock objection has long been raised against egalitarians. The alternative way of theorizing distributions is through two-person, small- scale thought experiments. According to this second type of Pie Case, the aim is to isolate our judgments about two persons’ relative distributive standing – whether in the currency of resources or welfare. We ask what each person deserves in light of her decision history. Consider, for example, a person who enjoys a great amount of leisure. Then we are asked to contrast her with an individual who makes a contribution to the market economy. Since we can distinguish the chess addict from the stock broker by a train of choices they have made, many are likely to judge that 8 James Harrington first introduced the so-called pie game to defend a separation of powers.

Authors: Beerbohm, Eric.
first   previous   Page 9 of 22   next   last



background image
9
matrixes of distribution.
8
In the original pie game, one player is assigned to cut the
pie, and the other is told to choose the slice. There is pressure, then, to arrive at
judgments that take equality as a default position in debates about distributing
benefits and burdens. I want to expand this idea to cover a broader range of cases
where we assess two outcomes, as in Divided World:
(1) Half at 100
(2) Half at 200
(2) Everyone at 145
In this case, we are to imagine that the two halves of the world’s population are
unaware of each other’s existence. On reflection, many hold that (1) may be better
than (2), for people are better off on average. Others respond that (1) is worse, since
the inequality in (1) bears no causal relation to welfare of those in (2). This method
asks for our verdicts about states of affairs. But this may ignore the point of view of
actual political agents, who are tasked with producing these end states. It suggests
one worry that we might raise about Pie Cases. Perhaps they are overly concerned
with how things look from the moral point of view of an omnipotent political
engineer, capable of willing end states. What this method bypasses is a sustained
reflection on the process of how goods ought to be distributed. This stock objection
has long been raised against egalitarians.
The alternative way of theorizing distributions is through two-person, small-
scale thought experiments. According to this second type of Pie Case, the aim is to
isolate our judgments about two persons’ relative distributive standing – whether in
the currency of resources or welfare. We ask what each person deserves in light of
her decision history. Consider, for example, a person who enjoys a great amount of
leisure. Then we are asked to contrast her with an individual who makes a
contribution to the market economy. Since we can distinguish the chess addict from
the stock broker by a train of choices they have made, many are likely to judge that
8
James Harrington first introduced the so-called pie game to defend a
separation of powers.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 22   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.