All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Simulation and the Need for Quality Practice in Teacher Preparation
Unformatted Document Text:  References Allen, M. (2003). Eight Questions on Teacher Preparation: What Does the Research Say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. Elliott, E. (2004). “Student learning in NCATE accreditation”. Quality Teaching. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education 13(1), p. 4-5. Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Cambourne, B., Turbill, J., Jonassen, D., Hedburg, J., et al. (2004) “Online classroom simulation: The ‘next wave’ for preservice teacher education?” Retrieved from http: www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/ferry.html Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (p. 15-46). New York: Macmillan. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Putnam, R.T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. Ramsey, G. (2000). “Quality matters”. Revitalizing Teaching: Critical Times, Critical Choices. Report of the review of teacher education in NSW. Sydney: NSW Department of Education & Training. Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 13-20. Schalock, M. (1998). “Accountability, student learning, and the preparation and licensure of teachers: Oregon’s teacher work sample methodology”. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12:3, 269-285. Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411- 436. Wilson, S., Floden, R. & Ferrini-Moody, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. University of Washington: Center for the Student of Teaching and Policy. 4

Authors: Girod, Mark. and Girod, Jerry.
first   previous   Page 4 of 4   next   last



background image
References
Allen, M. (2003). Eight Questions on Teacher Preparation: What Does the Research Say?
Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.
Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Elliott, E. (2004). “Student learning in NCATE accreditation”. Quality Teaching. Washington,
DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education 13(1), p. 4-5.
Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Cambourne, B., Turbill, J., Jonassen, D., Hedburg, J., et al. (2004) “Online
classroom simulation: The ‘next wave’ for preservice teacher education?” Retrieved
from http:
Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner and
R. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (p. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R.T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say
about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Ramsey, G. (2000). “Quality matters”. Revitalizing Teaching: Critical Times, Critical Choices.
Report of the review of teacher education in NSW. Sydney: NSW Department of
Education & Training.
Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 13-20.
Schalock, M. (1998). “Accountability, student learning, and the preparation and licensure of
teachers: Oregon’s teacher work sample methodology”. Journal of Personnel Evaluation
in Education, 12:3, 269-285.
Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-
436.
Wilson, S., Floden, R. & Ferrini-Moody, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current
knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. University of Washington: Center for the
Student of Teaching and Policy.
4


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 4   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.