All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Machiavelli's Critique of Expansion
Unformatted Document Text:  We recall that Machiavelli found a means of introducing his discussion of the league alternative right at the start of this Discourse, and after discussing it for awhile turned to the other two modes of expansion. He promised at the conclusion of his first discussion to explain further why the Tuscan league “could not go beyond Italy with (its) acquisitions” and why “even a great part of (Italy) remained intact” while the league held sway; this promise hangs over the account of the other two modes. And, when we recall this, we see that in his account of the Roman mode of expansion Machiavelli makes clear how employing that mode Rome went beyond Italy and why under that mode Italy did not remain intact. We thus would expect Machiavelli, in his presentation of leagues, to make good on his promise. In connection with this, we also might recall that in the previous discussion Machiavelli introduces a standard for judgment of the three modes, namely, usefulness, and he implies that his understanding of “usefulness” in this context is acquiring dominion that one can keep, since acquiring “dominion (one) cannot keep” is “useless.” He also implies there that two of the three modes of expansion are in some way useless, the mode employed by Sparta and Athens being “entirely useless.” And we recall that he does not call Rome’s mode “useful,” even when we expect him to do so; instead, he calls that mode “certain” or “true” and claims that Rome rose to an “excessive power.” We would expect, then, that if Machiavelli is presenting leagues as a genuine alternative to Rome’s mode of expansion, he will in his presentation of leagues make clear that leagues fulfill his standard of the “useful.” In this section we will see that in his discussion of the alternative of leagues Machiavelli, at least on the face of things, suggests that leagues succeed in addressing both of these matters. At the same time, however, we will see that his presentation also leads us to raise questions – questions which we will raise for the most part in the footnotes that accompany this section -- about 19

Authors: Davis, Matthew.
first   previous   Page 19 of 38   next   last



background image
We recall that Machiavelli found a means of introducing his discussion of the
league alternative right at the start of this Discourse, and after discussing it for awhile
turned to the other two modes of expansion. He promised at the conclusion of his first
discussion to explain further why the Tuscan league “could not go beyond Italy with (its)
acquisitions” and why “even a great part of (Italy) remained intact” while the league held
sway; this promise hangs over the account of the other two modes. And, when we recall
this, we see that in his account of the Roman mode of expansion Machiavelli makes clear
how employing that mode Rome went beyond Italy and why under that mode Italy did
not remain intact. We thus would expect Machiavelli, in his presentation of leagues, to
make good on his promise. In connection with this, we also might recall that in the
previous discussion Machiavelli introduces a standard for judgment of the three modes,
namely, usefulness, and he implies that his understanding of “usefulness” in this context
is acquiring dominion that one can keep, since acquiring “dominion (one) cannot keep” is
“useless.” He also implies there that two of the three modes of expansion are in some
way useless, the mode employed by Sparta and Athens being “entirely useless.” And we
recall that he does not call Rome’s mode “useful,” even when we expect him to do so;
instead, he calls that mode “certain” or “true” and claims that Rome rose to an “excessive
power.” We would expect, then, that if Machiavelli is presenting leagues as a genuine
alternative to Rome’s mode of expansion, he will in his presentation of leagues make
clear that leagues fulfill his standard of the “useful.” In this section we will see that in his
discussion of the alternative of leagues Machiavelli, at least on the face of things,
suggests that leagues succeed in addressing both of these matters. At the same time,
however, we will see that his presentation also leads us to raise questions – questions
which we will raise for the most part in the footnotes that accompany this section -- about
19


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 38   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.