Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39785_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Waligore, Timothy. "Kant's Cosmopolitan Right, Cultural Interaction, and the Right to Visit" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39785_index.html>

Waligore, T. P. , 2005-09-01 "Kant's Cosmopolitan Right, Cultural Interaction, and the Right to Visit" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39785_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper looks at recent works by Jeremy Waldron and asks how useful Immanuel Kant’s discussion of cosmopolitan right is for contemporary theorizing about cultural interaction and indigenous peoples. Waldron uses Kant’s category of cosmopolitan right as a starting point for his own theorizing, but diverges from the particulars of Kant’s analysis. I question whether Waldron has properly reconstructed Kant’s category of cosmopolitan right. If Waldron is wrong about the presuppositions of cosmopolitan right, it undermines his ability to draw lessons from cosmopolitan right for the discipline of politics at the domestic state level. I maintain that the autonomy that Kant did actually recognize cuts against Waldron’s claims about the spirit in which Kant approached cultural interaction. In Kant’s description of cosmopolitan right, the free movement of travelers is potentially restricted as soon as indigenous peoples' collective ways of life would be threatened. I argue that theories of cosmopolitan right should avoid the dark side of hospitality, where the right to attempt commerce is confused with a right to commerce. In justifying his argument about the necessity of his version of the supersession thesis, Waldron tells a story about historical inevitability that could in effect justify past ‘wrongs.' Waldron's theory then wrongfully scrubs from existence the stains of injustice. Such are the potential pitfalls in adapting cosmopolitan right without maintaining Kant's anti-imperialist sentiments.

Principles on Collision Course? State Sovereignty Meets Peoples’ Right of Self Determination in the Case of Kosovo

Property Rights Politics: An Institutional Approach to State-Society Interactions.