Convention All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39909_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Reisert, Joseph. and Barkin, Samuel. "Just War Theory: A Critique and Reformulation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39909_index.html>

Reisert, J. and Barkin, S. S. , 2005-09-01 "Just War Theory: A Critique and Reformulation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39909_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Perhaps the greatest obstacle to the formulation of a coherent normative theory governingthe use of military force by liberal states is the lack of a well-defined model that describes with sufficient accuracy the nature of the international system.1 Neither of the simplemodels to which theorists have historically been drawn can be accepted. The first views the relations among states as ideally mirroring the relationship among citizens in asubstantially just liberal state (let us call this the legalist’s model); the second views the relations among states ideally as an amoral anarchy, as described in Hobbes’s portrait ofthe state of nature (let us call this the realist’s model). Although both models have a certain measure of plausibility, their ultimate inadequacy is in fact well understood. Thepre-eminent contemporary just war theorist, Michael Walzer explicitly recognizes the limitations of the two simple views, but, we argue, his normative prescriptions do notentirely escape the pull of the simple models; this dependence, we suggest, generates problematic consequences for the coherence of his normative prescriptions. Afterdemonstrating the difficulties Walzer’s excessive dependence on the legalist’s model of international society generates, we propose an alternative normative conception ofinternational society based on a Rousseauian ideal model of the international system.

"Expanding the Moral Community" or "Blaming the Victim"?: The Politics of State Education Accountability Policy

Regional Protection of Human Rights as Field of Research of Human Rights, Comparative Politics, International Law and International Organization Theory