 |
Participatory Engineering: Can Democratic Reform Increase Political Participation?
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
PARTICIPATORY ENGINEERING: CAN DEMOCRATIC REFORM
INCREASE POLITICAL PARTICIATION
1
Thomas Zittel
University of Mannheim
Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES)
Postfach
68131 Mannheim, Germany
Phone: +49 621 181-2815
E-mail:
thomas.## email not listed ##
http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/
Impressionistic evidence suggests that political elites in many established democracies perceive their system of government in a state of crisis. The rhetoric of elected officials stresses downward trends in electoral participation and organizational membership to argue that citizens are turning their back on democracy. As a reaction to this observation, they consider measures and policies to positively affect political participation via institutional reform. In this paper, I define these activities as participatory engineering. Liberal democratic theory, as well as theories of political participation, paints a sceptical picture regarding the effectiveness of participatory engineering. Its proponents point to the preoccupation of individuals with private concerns and to individual capacities largely defined by socio-economic factors as major determinants of political engagement. This paper turns to theories of participatory democracy for an alternative view and to systematically discuss the effectiveness of participatory engineering from a theoretical perspective. My assumption is that any theoretical argument in support of the effectiveness of participatory engineering has to be specific regarding the institutions that are assumed to have a positive impact on participation and regarding the mechanisms that is assumed to link the institutional and behavioural levels of politics. With this argument in mind, the paper synthesizes the diverse body of literature attached to the concept of participatory democracy. It distinguishes between three strategies of participatory engineering that emphasize different linkage mechanisms related to different institutional options for democratic reform. I label these strategies as expansive democratization, integrative democratization and efficiency-oriented democratization. The paper furthermore discusses questions for further theoretical and empirical inquiry that emerge from this taxonomy.
1
Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,
Washington, D.C., 31. August – 4. September; The paper is work in progress; comments are welcome, please do not quote without the author’s permission.
|
| |
| |
|
|
PARTICIPATORY ENGINEERING: CAN DEMOCRATIC REFORM
INCREASE POLITICAL PARTICIATION
1
Thomas Zittel
University of Mannheim
Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES)
Postfach
68131 Mannheim, Germany
Phone: +49 621 181-2815
E-mail:
thomas.## email not listed ##
http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/
Impressionistic evidence suggests that political elites in many established democracies perceive their system of government in a state of crisis. The rhetoric of elected officials stresses downward trends in electoral participation and organizational membership to argue that citizens are turning their back on democracy. As a reaction to this observation, they consider measures and policies to positively affect political participation via institutional reform. In this paper, I define these activities as participatory engineering. Liberal democratic theory, as well as theories of political participation, paints a sceptical picture regarding the effectiveness of participatory engineering. Its proponents point to the preoccupation of individuals with private concerns and to individual capacities largely defined by socio-economic factors as major determinants of political engagement. This paper turns to theories of participatory democracy for an alternative view and to systematically discuss the effectiveness of participatory engineering from a theoretical perspective. My assumption is that any theoretical argument in support of the effectiveness of participatory engineering has to be specific regarding the institutions that are assumed to have a positive impact on participation and regarding the mechanisms that is assumed to link the institutional and behavioural levels of politics. With this argument in mind, the paper synthesizes the diverse body of literature attached to the concept of participatory democracy. It distinguishes between three strategies of participatory engineering that emphasize different linkage mechanisms related to different institutional options for democratic reform. I label these strategies as expansive democratization, integrative democratization and efficiency-oriented democratization. The paper furthermore discusses questions for further theoretical and empirical inquiry that emerge from this taxonomy.
1
Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,
Washington, D.C., 31. August – 4. September; The paper is work in progress; comments are welcome, please do not quote without the author’s permission.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|