|
|
|
|
Capability, Freedom and Democracy |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
As a strategy for addressing the pressing issue of absolute deprivation and as a critique of alternative informational frameworks of justice, Amartya Sens capability approach has come to enjoy an independent existence in the lexicon of distributive justice. Rather than specifying capabilities in terms of human flourishing, Sen focuses on the freedom of a society to prioritize its valuable capabilities and functionings, recognizing the crucial role that democratic public reasoning plays in human well-being in terms of the opportunities it provides for open public discussion and scrutiny as well as in the formation of values. Although Sen follows Rawls in much of his emphasis on the role of public reasoning, there are important differences between their conceptions of the limits and content of public reasoning and in their understanding of political objectivity. This paper draws on the implications of these differences for some of the tensions between democracy and justice and suggests that the substantially broader conceptions that supplement the capability approach give us good reasons to ground the demands of justice in democratic procedures. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
sen (81), capabl (81), reason (64), public (54), justic (53), polit (50), rawl (41), object (40), democraci (40), freedom (37), approach (34), differ (29), one (28), concept (25), valu (25), equal (25), well (24), good (22), democrat (21), theori (19), must (18), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Amartya Sen, John Rawls, public reasoning, political objectivity, capability, distributive justice |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Abraham, Arun. "Capability, Freedom and Democracy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39936_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Abraham, A. , 2005-09-01 "Capability, Freedom and Democracy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p39936_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: As a strategy for addressing the pressing issue of absolute deprivation and as a critique of alternative informational frameworks of justice, Amartya Sens capability approach has come to enjoy an independent existence in the lexicon of distributive justice. Rather than specifying capabilities in terms of human flourishing, Sen focuses on the freedom of a society to prioritize its valuable capabilities and functionings, recognizing the crucial role that democratic public reasoning plays in human well-being in terms of the opportunities it provides for open public discussion and scrutiny as well as in the formation of values. Although Sen follows Rawls in much of his emphasis on the role of public reasoning, there are important differences between their conceptions of the limits and content of public reasoning and in their understanding of political objectivity. This paper draws on the implications of these differences for some of the tensions between democracy and justice and suggests that the substantially broader conceptions that supplement the capability approach give us good reasons to ground the demands of justice in democratic procedures. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
19 |
| Word count: |
6060 |
| Text sample: |
| Capability Freedom and Democracy∗ Arun Abraham** August 24 2005 Abstract As a strategy for addressing the pressing issue of absolute deprivation and as a critique of alternative informational frameworks of justice Amartya Sen’s capability approach has come to enjoy an independent existence in the lexicon of distributive justice. Rather than specifying capabilities in terms of human flourishing Sen focuses on the freedom of a society to prioritize its valuable capabilities and functionings recognizing the crucial role that democratic public |
| The Journal of Philosophy vol. LXXXII no. 4 169-221. Sen Amartya (1993). “Positional Objectivity ” Philosophy & Public Affairs v. 22 no. 2 126-145. Sen Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf. Sen Amartya (2002). “Open and Closed Impartiality ” The Journal of Philosophy vol. XCIX no. 9 445-469. Sen Amartya (2004a). “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights ” Philosophy & Public Affairs Sen Amartya (2004b). “Capabilities Lists and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation ” Feminist Economics |
Similar Titles:
Family democracy, communication patterns and adolescents' political development (democratic values, reasoning and civic engagement).
Democratic Development and Public Goods Spending: a Comparative Politics Approach Using the American States during the Antebellum Period (1789-1860)
|
|