All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Decision Making on Behalf of Others
Unformatted Document Text:  Abstract In politics specifically and society generally people are often in a position where either they make decisions on behalf of someone else or someone else is making decisions on their behalf. But empirical social science research has provided little information on the extent to which decisions are different when they are made on behalf of others. In this paper, we draw on evolutionary theory to formulate a set of expectations regarding the differences between decisions people make for themselves and decisions they make for others (representation). Using laboratory experiments, we then provide preliminary tests of these hypotheses. The finding of most interest is that representatives are at least as careful of constituent resources as constituents are of their own resources. Though this result would seem to go against standard principal-agent theory, it makes perfect sense when seen in an evolutionary context. People care about what others think of them and this caring will lead representatives to pander to their constituents even if their position as representative is not hanging in the balance. Representatives’ solicitude vis-à-vis constituents may be due more to basic human psychology than to institutional structures such as elections.

Authors: Hibbing, John. and Alford, John.
first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last



background image
Abstract
In politics specifically and society generally people are often in a position where either
they make decisions on behalf of someone else or someone else is making decisions on their
behalf. But empirical social science research has provided little information on the extent to
which decisions are different when they are made on behalf of others. In this paper, we draw on
evolutionary theory to formulate a set of expectations regarding the differences between
decisions people make for themselves and decisions they make for others (representation).
Using laboratory experiments, we then provide preliminary tests of these hypotheses. The
finding of most interest is that representatives are at least as careful of constituent resources as
constituents are of their own resources. Though this result would seem to go against standard
principal-agent theory, it makes perfect sense when seen in an evolutionary context. People care
about what others think of them and this caring will lead representatives to pander to their
constituents even if their position as representative is not hanging in the balance.
Representatives’ solicitude vis-à-vis constituents may be due more to basic human psychology
than to institutional structures such as elections.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.