Participation bias and framing effects in citizens’ juries / 18
Irwin, I. (2001). “Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology Policy: a Commentary on Recent UK
Experience,” PLA Notes 40.
Kuper, R. (1997). “Deliberating Waste: the Hertfordshire Citizens’ Jury,” Local Environment 2, 139-53.
Ladd, E. C. (1996). “Fishkin’s Deliberative Poll is Flawed Science and Dubious Democracy,” Public
Perspective 7: 1, 41-45.
Mansbridge, J (1983). Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
., “Feminism and Democratic Community,” in Chapman & Shapiro (eds.) (1991). Democratic
Community, Nomos no. 35. New York: New York University Press.
McIver, S. (1997). An Evaluation of the King’s Fund Citizens’ Jury Programme. Birmingham: Health
Services Management Centre.
Merkle, D. (1996). “Review: The National Issues Convention Deliberative Poll,” Public Opinion Quarterly
60, 588-619.
Mirenowicz, J. (2001). “The Danish Consensus Conference Model in Switzerland and France: on the
Importance of Framing the Issue,” PlA Notes 40.
Mitofsky, W. J. (1996a). “The Emperor has no Clothes,” Public Perspective 7: 3, 17-19.
., (1996b). “It’s Not Deliberative and it’s Not a Poll,” Public Perspective 7: 1, 4-6.
Newport, F. (1996). “Why Do We Need a Deliberative Poll,” Public Perspective 7: 1, 7-9.
Pickard, S. (1998). “Citizenship and Consumerism in Health Care: A Critique of Citizens’ Juries,” Social
Policy and Administration 32: 3, 226-244.
Renn, O., T. Webler & P. Wiedemann (eds.) (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation.
Dordecht: Kluwer.
Rowe, G. & L. Frewer (2000) “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation,” Science
Technology and Human Values 25: 1, 3-29.
Sanders, L. (1997). “Against Deliberation,” Political Theory 25: 3, 347-76.
Smith, G., & C. Wales (2000). “Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy,” Political Studies 48, 51-65.
Stewart, J. (1995). Innovations in Democratic Practice. IPPR, Birmingham.
., (1996). Further Innovations in Democratic Practice. IPPR, Birmingham.
., (1997). More Innovations in Democratic Practice. IPPR, Birminghman.
Stewart, J., E. Kendall & A. Coote (eds.) (1994). Citizens’ Juries. London: IPPR.
Stirling, A. (2001). “Inclusive Deliberation and Scientific Expertise: Precaution, Diversity and
Transparency in the Governance of Risk,” PLA Notes 40.
Stirling, A. & Mayer S. (2001). “A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: a Multicriteria
Mapping Study of a Genetically Modified Crop,” Environment and Planning C: Government and
Policy (2001). Special issue on environmental policy processes, vol. 19, 529-555.
Sunstein, C. R. “Preferences and Politics,” in R. Goodin & P. Pettit (eds.) (1997). Contemporary Political
Philosophy: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tringali, B. (1996). “Experimenting with Artificial Democracy,” Public Perspective 7: 1, 19-20.
Wallace, H. (2001). “The Issue of Framing and Consensus Conferences,”PLA Notes 40.
Wampler, B. (2004). “Expanding Accountability through Participatory Institutions: Mayors, Citizens and
Budgeting in Three Brazilian Municipalities,” Latin American Politics and Society 46: 2, 73-99.
Young, I. M. (1989). “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship,”
Ethics 99, 250-74.
., “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy,” in S.
Benhabib (ed.) (1996). Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton,
New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
., (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Convention