Participation bias and framing effects in citizens’ juries / 26
APPENDIX 4: STABILITY OF JURY OPINION SHIFT
Paired Samples Statistics
Std.
Std. Error
Mean
N Deviation of Mean
Pair 1
Waste incinerators essential
for
waste
management in Ireland (evening)
1.89
55
.599
0.081
(IES2004 jury)
2.74
38
1.781
0.289
Pair 2
Waste incinerators essential
for
waste
management in Ireland (IES2004 jury) 2.74
38
1.781
0.289
(IES2004 panel) 4.45
271
1.926
0.117
Pair 3
Waste incinerator should be built in
Ringsend (evening)
1.65
55
1.040
0.140
(IES2004 jury)
2.21
38
1.58
0.256
Pair 4
Waste incinerator should be built in
Ringsend (IES2004 jury)
2.21
38
1.58
0.256
(IES2004 panel)
3.93
272
2.002
0.121
Paired Samples Correlations
N Correlation
Sig.
Pair 1 waste incinerators essential to waste management
in Ireland (evening) v (IES2004 jury)
38
-2.19
.186
Pair 2 waste incinerators essential to waste management
in Ireland (IES2004 jury) v (IES2004 panel)
38
-1.09
.516
Pair 3
waste incinerator should be built in Ringsend
(evening) v (IES2004 jury)
38
.180
.280
Pair 4
waste incinerator should be built in Ringsend
(IES2004 jury) v (IES2004 panel)
38
.009
.958
Paired Samples Test
Paired
Differences
t
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Pair 1
Waste incinerators are essential to waste
management in Ireland (evening) v (IES2004 jury)
-.85
-2.820
.007
Pair 2
waste incinerators essential to waste
management in Ireland (IES2004 jury) v (IES2004
panel)
-1.71
-5.182
.000
Pair 3
waste incinerator should be built in Ringsend
(evening) v (IES2004 jury)
-.56
-2.408
.043
Pair 4
waste incinerator should be built in Ringsend
(morning) v (evening)
-1.72
-5.065
.000
Convention