All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

George W. Bush, the Republican Party, and the New American Party System
Unformatted Document Text:  Cuba. In November 2004, a federal district court ruled that the military tribunals violated both American and international law, thereby threatening the system devised by the president. The White House also claimed sweeping executive authority to arrest and hold individuals (both American citizens and foreign citizens) suspected of links to terrorists without formally charging them with crimes, and argued that the judiciary had no authority to review the status of these detainees (Fisher 2005:114). These “enemy combatants”, according to the administration, were not subject to the standards of treatment delineated by the Geneva Conventions, did not possess rights to attorney, and could be held incommunicado for an indefinite period of time. The administration’s claims to plenary authority over the fate of “enemy combatants” shocked even some conservatives inside and outside Congress: retiring House Majority Leader Dick Armey of Texas declared that Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Justice Department were “out of control” (quoted in McMahon 2004:130). The White House’s position on “enemy combatants” ultimately faced review by the Supreme Court, which held in Rasul v. Bush (2004) and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) that the courts did possess the authority to review the status of both American citizens and foreign citizens deemed “enemy combatants” and held without charge in the United States and at Guantanamo Bay. A sober assessment of Bush’s administrative presidency suggests that Bush has been nearly as ambitious as Ronald Reagan in his use of bureaucratic politics in the realm of domestic affairs, despite the considerably more favorable political environment he has enjoyed throughout his presidency. In foreign affairs, Bush has permitted Congress to play an important role, but one that has been limited to enacting sweeping grants of authority that have given the administration wide latitude in deciding where and how to fight a war against terror and to provide for homeland security. Bush’s extensive use of administrative politics suggests that even presidents who take party-building seriously and enjoy strong partisan support in Congress are likely to be 69

Authors: Milkis, Sidney. and Rhodes, Jesse.
first   previous   Page 69 of 92   next   last



background image
Cuba. In November 2004, a federal district court ruled that the military tribunals violated both
American and international law, thereby threatening the system devised by the president.
The White House also claimed sweeping executive authority to arrest and hold
individuals (both American citizens and foreign citizens) suspected of links to terrorists without
formally charging them with crimes, and argued that the judiciary had no authority to review the
status of these detainees (Fisher 2005:114). These “enemy combatants”, according to the
administration, were not subject to the standards of treatment delineated by the Geneva
Conventions, did not possess rights to attorney, and could be held incommunicado for an
indefinite period of time. The administration’s claims to plenary authority over the fate of
“enemy combatants” shocked even some conservatives inside and outside Congress: retiring
House Majority Leader Dick Armey of Texas declared that Attorney General John Ashcroft and
the Justice Department were “out of control” (quoted in McMahon 2004:130). The White
House’s position on “enemy combatants” ultimately faced review by the Supreme Court, which
held in Rasul v. Bush (2004) and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) that the courts did possess the
authority to review the status of both American citizens and foreign citizens deemed “enemy
combatants” and held without charge in the United States and at Guantanamo Bay.
A sober assessment of Bush’s administrative presidency suggests that Bush has been
nearly as ambitious as Ronald Reagan in his use of bureaucratic politics in the realm of domestic
affairs, despite the considerably more favorable political environment he has enjoyed throughout
his presidency. In foreign affairs, Bush has permitted Congress to play an important role, but one
that has been limited to enacting sweeping grants of authority that have given the administration
wide latitude in deciding where and how to fight a war against terror and to provide for
homeland security. Bush’s extensive use of administrative politics suggests that even presidents
who take party-building seriously and enjoy strong partisan support in Congress are likely to be
69


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 69 of 92   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.