|
|
|
|
Questions of Party Nationalization |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper represents one small piece of a larger project that attempts to unpack the issues of political nationalization and its implications, as well as place the nationalization literature within a broader discussion of electoral forces – including electoral volatility and local voting. We begin the paper with a more thorough discussion of the static and dynamic conceptions of nationalization. In this section, we define in detail both conceptions of party nationalization and discuss the relationship between the two. There we also provide a brief overview of some of the presumed effects of nationalization as a means of motivating the importance of nationalization as an agenda for research. In section two we discuss the various measures of nationalization that are currently in use and provide a discussion of our alternative. We also provide an initial empirical overview of our data and compare it to that of previous work. Then, before concluding in party four, part three of the paper turns to the empirical testing of our hypotheses. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
nation (247), parti (188), district (108), static (88), dynam (80), vote (53), across (52), two (50), support (50), case (49), elector (49), result (47), valu (45), local (43), polit (42), m (40), countri (37), differ (37), system (37), level (36), elect (35), |
Author's Keywords:
|
political nationalization, territorial structuring, electoral politics, territorial variation, electoral volatility, voting |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Morgenstern, Scott. and Swindle, Stephen. "Questions of Party Nationalization" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40314_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Morgenstern, S. and Swindle, S. , 2005-09-01 "Questions of Party Nationalization" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40314_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper represents one small piece of a larger project that attempts to unpack the issues of political nationalization and its implications, as well as place the nationalization literature within a broader discussion of electoral forces – including electoral volatility and local voting. We begin the paper with a more thorough discussion of the static and dynamic conceptions of nationalization. In this section, we define in detail both conceptions of party nationalization and discuss the relationship between the two. There we also provide a brief overview of some of the presumed effects of nationalization as a means of motivating the importance of nationalization as an agenda for research. In section two we discuss the various measures of nationalization that are currently in use and provide a discussion of our alternative. We also provide an initial empirical overview of our data and compare it to that of previous work. Then, before concluding in party four, part three of the paper turns to the empirical testing of our hypotheses. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
23 |
| Word count: |
10149 |
| Text sample: |
| Questions of Party Nationalization Scott Morgenstern University of Pittsburgh smorgens@pitt.edu Stephen Swindle Lee University sswindle@leeuniversity.edu Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Washington D.C. September 1-4 2005 Copyright by the American Political Science Association Questions of Party Nationalization In The Semisovereign People: A Realists View of Democracy in America (1960) E.E. Schattschneider provides the first systematic investigation of political nationalization and its implications. This seminal work spawned an impressive list of additional |
| and the 1955-70 data for the UK. a Where there are only two competitors the results for the two parties or coalitions will be identical. b For countries with two-tiered systems (Germany Japan) results are displayed for both single member districts (SMD) and the proportional representation (PR) districts. PR results for Japan are calculated using PR votes in the 300 SMD districts and for Germany they are calculated using the PR data from the 248 constituencies. (The results change |
Similar Titles:
Party Voting in the US Federal System: Does the National Political Context Matter for State Level Elections?
Racial “Threat” and Voting for the Extreme Right: The Contextual Determinants of Support for the British National Party in the 2002 and 2003 English Local Elections
|
|