All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals
Unformatted Document Text:  36 Munck, Gerardo L. and Richard Snyder. 2004. “What Has Comparative Politics Accomplished?” APSA-CP. Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics Vol. 15, Nº 2 (Summer): 26-31. -------. Forthcoming, 2006. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press). National Research Council. 1995. Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press). Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” pp. 693-721, in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner (eds.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline (New York and Washington, D.C.: W.W. Norton & Co. and The American Political Science Association). Portes, Alejandro. 2005. “Sociology in the Hemisphere: Past Convergencies and a New Middle- Range Agenda,” pp. 27-52, in Charles H. Wood and Bryan R. Roberts (eds.), Rethinking Development in Latin America (University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press). Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago). Sartori, Giovanni. 2004. “Where is Political Science Going?” PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 37, Nº 4 (October): 785-86. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1993. “Comparative Politics,” pp. 171-77, in Joel Krieger (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World (New York: Oxford University Press). -------. 2002. “Seven (Disputable) Theses Concerning the Future of ‘Transatlanticised’ or ‘Globalised’ Political Science,” European Political Science Vol. 1, Nº 2 (Spring): 23-40. Sigelman, Lee and George H. Gadbois. 1983. “Contemporary Comparative Politics: An Inventory and Assessment,” Comparative Political Studies Vol. 16, Nº 3 (October): 275-305. Shapiro, Ian, Rogers Smith and Tarek Masoud (eds.). 2004. Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press). Skocpol, Theda. 2003. “Doubly Engaged Social Science: The Promise of Comparative Historical Analysis,” pp. 407-28, in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (New York: Cambridge University Press). Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “Reflections on ‘Problem Selection’ in Comparative Politics,” pp. 1-19 in Stepan, Arguing Comparative Politics (New York: Oxford University Press). Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “Formal Theory and Comparative Politics,” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics Vol. 8, Nº 1 (Winter): 6-7. -------. 2002. “Rational Choice Institutionalism,” pp. 660-92, in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner (eds.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline (New York and Washington, D.C.: W.W. Norton & Co. and The American Political Science Association). Weyland, Kurt. 2002. “Limitations of Rational-Choice Institutionalism for the Study of Latin American Politics,” Studies in Comparative International Development Vol. 37, Nº 1 (Spring): 57-85.

Authors: Munck, Gerardo.
first   previous   Page 37 of 37   next   last



background image
36
Munck, Gerardo L. and Richard Snyder. 2004. “What Has Comparative Politics Accomplished?”
APSA-CP. Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics Vol. 15, Nº 2
(Summer): 26-31.
-------. Forthcoming, 2006. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics (Baltimore, Md.:
The Johns Hopkins University Press).
National Research Council. 1995. Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States:
Continuity and Change (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press).
Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political
Science,” pp. 693-721, in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner (eds.), Political Science: The
State of the Discipline
(New York and Washington, D.C.: W.W. Norton & Co. and The
American Political Science Association).
Portes, Alejandro. 2005. “Sociology in the Hemisphere: Past Convergencies and a New Middle-
Range Agenda,” pp. 27-52, in Charles H. Wood and Bryan R. Roberts (eds.), Rethinking
Development in Latin America
(University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press).
Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago).
Sartori, Giovanni. 2004. “Where is Political Science Going?” PS: Political Science & Politics
Vol. 37, Nº 4 (October): 785-86.
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1993. “Comparative Politics,” pp. 171-77, in Joel Krieger (ed.), The
Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World (New York: Oxford University Press).
-------. 2002. “Seven (Disputable) Theses Concerning the Future of ‘Transatlanticised’ or
‘Globalised’ Political Science,” European Political Science Vol. 1, Nº 2 (Spring): 23-40.
Sigelman, Lee and George H. Gadbois. 1983. “Contemporary Comparative Politics: An
Inventory and Assessment,” Comparative Political Studies Vol. 16, Nº 3 (October): 275-305.
Shapiro, Ian, Rogers Smith and Tarek Masoud (eds.). 2004. Problems and Methods in the Study
of Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. “Doubly Engaged Social Science: The Promise of Comparative Historical
Analysis,” pp. 407-28, in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer (eds.), Comparative
Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences
(New York: Cambridge University Press).
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “Reflections on ‘Problem Selection’ in Comparative Politics,” pp. 1-19 in
Stepan, Arguing Comparative Politics (New York: Oxford University Press).
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “Formal Theory and Comparative Politics,” APSA-CP: Newsletter of
the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics Vol. 8, Nº 1 (Winter): 6-7.
-------. 2002. “Rational Choice Institutionalism,” pp. 660-92, in Ira Katznelson and Helen V.
Milner (eds.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline (New York and Washington,
D.C.: W.W. Norton & Co. and The American Political Science Association).
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. “Limitations of Rational-Choice Institutionalism for the Study of Latin
American Politics,” Studies in Comparative International Development Vol. 37, Nº 1
(Spring): 57-85.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 37 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.