All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Securing Tenure: Authoritarian Institutions, International Conflict, and Leadership/Regime Survival
Unformatted Document Text:  17 IV. Conclusion One central element of US foreign policy since the end of the Cold War has been containing and pursuing the end of authoritarian regimes. Our research indicates that the success of US policy is likely to vary by the infrastructural institutions of an authoritarian regime. Instead of focusing on how many elites are the principal decision-makers, the critical difference among authoritarian regimes is what institutions allow them to sustain their control over their populace. Leaders of party-based regimes should be better able to retain their tenure than their military counterparts because of the greater ruling capacity provided by political institutions. This should also insulate party leaders from the effects of international conflict on leadership tenure. Conversely, the lack of strong institutions to provide control over society should prompt military leaders to see conflict as a potential tool to mobilize the populace and prevent elite divisions. However, this makes the political fortunes of military leaders dependent on the outcome of a conflict. We analyze this argument by looking at all leaders from 1919-1995 and find general support for our argument. First, authoritarian leaders who rely on party institutions initially face a higher likelihood of removal, although this effect changes the longer the leader stays in power. After three years in office, a party-based leader is likely to have a greater propensity for survival in office than his military counterparts. This comports with our general argument that while military leaders may be able to effectively use repression to maintain their rule in the short term, the long term ability of party based institutions to maintain societal control leads party based governments to have longer tenures once they have been in office a few years. Second, the fate of military leaders is influenced primarily by losses and defeats, but not draws in a war; and draws but not wins or loses in a crisis. Finally, party based leaders are not affected by the

Authors: Lai, Brian.
first   previous   Page 19 of 28   next   last



background image
17
IV. Conclusion
One central element of US foreign policy since the end of the Cold War has been
containing and pursuing the end of authoritarian regimes. Our research indicates that the success
of US policy is likely to vary by the infrastructural institutions of an authoritarian regime. Instead
of focusing on how many elites are the principal decision-makers, the critical difference among
authoritarian regimes is what institutions allow them to sustain their control over their populace.
Leaders of party-based regimes should be better able to retain their tenure than their military
counterparts because of the greater ruling capacity provided by political institutions. This should
also insulate party leaders from the effects of international conflict on leadership tenure.
Conversely, the lack of strong institutions to provide control over society should prompt military
leaders to see conflict as a potential tool to mobilize the populace and prevent elite divisions.
However, this makes the political fortunes of military leaders dependent on the outcome of a
conflict.
We analyze this argument by looking at all leaders from 1919-1995 and find general
support for our argument. First, authoritarian leaders who rely on party institutions initially face
a higher likelihood of removal, although this effect changes the longer the leader stays in power.
After three years in office, a party-based leader is likely to have a greater propensity for survival
in office than his military counterparts. This comports with our general argument that while
military leaders may be able to effectively use repression to maintain their rule in the short term,
the long term ability of party based institutions to maintain societal control leads party based
governments to have longer tenures once they have been in office a few years. Second, the fate
of military leaders is influenced primarily by losses and defeats, but not draws in a war; and
draws but not wins or loses in a crisis. Finally, party based leaders are not affected by the


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.