Citation

Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist childcare ambitions in Europe's most liberal welfare regime.

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Long a notorious laggard in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), the UK's poor historical record in this area could stand as a symbol of the enduring liberal-residualist qualities of its welfare state that existed alongside the 'social democracy in embryo' such institutions as the National Health Service. This paper examines recent developments in UK ECEC policy, reflecting critically on widely accepted arguments about welfare regimes. The UK had not debated a 'national' childcare strategy until the late 1990s, when the NCS emerged. New Labour's NCS has overseen a rapid and substantial growth in ECEC. In the context of a likely General Election in spring 2005, ECEC has risen right to the top of the domestic policy agenda, with Tony Blair committing to 'Universal, Affordable Childcare'. Given that dominant theories suggest the potential for change is sharply constrained by the type of welfare regime that exists within a state, the paradox is that moves towards univeral childcare could occur within Europe's most liberal-residual welfare regime, inaugurated by a 'New' Labour government often characterized as a continuation of the previous Conservative governments.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

welfar (131), regim (125), polici (115), state (98), ecec (78), new (71), social (65), labour (65), childcar (48), liber (46), particular (46), govern (40), p (35), earli (35), polit (35), develop (31), work (31), public (30), analysi (29), within (27), year (27),

Author's Keywords:

UK,Britain,social policy,welfare state,welfare regimes,childcare,devolution,New Labour
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40486_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Wincott, Daniel. "Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist childcare ambitions in Europe's most liberal welfare regime." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40486_index.html>

APA Citation:

Wincott, D. , 2005-09-01 "Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist childcare ambitions in Europe's most liberal welfare regime." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40486_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Long a notorious laggard in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), the UK's poor historical record in this area could stand as a symbol of the enduring liberal-residualist qualities of its welfare state that existed alongside the 'social democracy in embryo' such institutions as the National Health Service. This paper examines recent developments in UK ECEC policy, reflecting critically on widely accepted arguments about welfare regimes. The UK had not debated a 'national' childcare strategy until the late 1990s, when the NCS emerged. New Labour's NCS has overseen a rapid and substantial growth in ECEC. In the context of a likely General Election in spring 2005, ECEC has risen right to the top of the domestic policy agenda, with Tony Blair committing to 'Universal, Affordable Childcare'. Given that dominant theories suggest the potential for change is sharply constrained by the type of welfare regime that exists within a state, the paradox is that moves towards univeral childcare could occur within Europe's most liberal-residual welfare regime, inaugurated by a 'New' Labour government often characterized as a continuation of the previous Conservative governments.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 28
Word count: 10216
Text sample:
Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist childcare ambitions in Europe's ‘most liberal’ welfare regime. Daniel Wincott Department of Political science and International Studies The University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK Tel: UK (0)121 414 6263 D.Wincott@bham.ac.uk Draft: Not for citation without the author’s permission. Comments welcome. This paper forms part of a research project ‘Devolution and the Comparative Territorial Analysis of the Welfare State’(award number L 219252104) funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s
purpose of my critical reflections on welfare regime theory has been as much to defend the 68 Pearce and Paxton ‘Introduction’ p. xxi 69 Morgan Whose hand rocks the cradle? p. 459 27 conceptual value of ‘regimes’ for comparative analysis as to draw attention to its limits. Shorn of the implication that they ought to muster empirical rich descriptions of particular cases regimes remain a vital tool for comparative welfare state analysis. They need to be defended against an


Similar Titles:
East Asian Social Welfare Regimes and Path Dependency Re-considered:Childcare Policy in Japan

Employment Regulation, Welfare-States and Gender Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Part-time Work

Post-Communist Welfare States: The Politics of Shrinking Public Social Provision

The Welfare State, Public Opinion, and Power Resources Theory: Social Rights Support and Welfare State Regimes in Cross-National Perspective


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.