All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist childcare ambitions in Europe's most liberal welfare regime.
Unformatted Document Text:  INTRODUCTION No consensus has developed among analysts of UK politics on the characterization of the New Labour governments. Many regard Labour as operating within, and basically constrained by, the political economy framework consolidated over the previous 18 years of Conservative government. Colin Hay punningly encapsulated this continuity from Major to Blair as ‘Blaijorism’. 1 Those more closely identified with ‘New’ Labour emphasize its novelty as a ‘Third Way’ between neoliberal and ‘old-style’ Labour; Giddens’ attempt to capture the zeitgeist after the 1997 election landslide was nonetheless subtitled ‘The Renewal of Social Democracy’. 2 Although these differences of interpretation encompass both economic and social policies, only the latter are considered in any detail in this paper, which concentrates on Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) policies. ECEC is, in a sense, a critical policy; the UK having long been a notorious laggard in this field, soon after its election New Labour’s National Childcare Strategy (NCS) 3 made ECEC a state-wide priority for the first time. Today, (critical) friends of New Labour argue that ‘entitlements to childcare and early years education in a high-quality, publicly regulated and comprehensive service should form the centrepiece of progressive institution-building in the early 21 st century, just as the NHS did in the immediate post-war period’. 4 That such an ambition can even be stated testifies to the changed in ECEC policy, given Britain’s long laggardly history in this field. Equally, if even ECEC remains fundamentally constrained by the pre-Labour policy legacy – or more critically if New Labour strategy is itself ‘neoliberal’ – then any social democratic aspirations Blair government might have would lack credibility. 1 Colin Hay ‘Blaijorism: Towards a One-Vision Polity’ Political Quarterly 1997, 68, 372-9, see generally his book The political economy of new Labour: Labouring under false pretences? Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999. 2 Anthony Giddens The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy Cambridge: Polity, 1997. While the ‘Third Way’ phrase has fallen out of fashion somewhat, we shall see that the notion of striking a new path between previously incompatible alternatives remains a motif of self-styled progressives on the British center-left. Their latest slogan - that Britain has an ‘Anglo-Social’ regime – is developed in the showcase publication of the Institute for Public Policy Research, Nick Pearce and Will Paxton, eds, Social Justice: Building a Fairer Britain London: Politico’s Publishing, 2005, and will be interrogated below. 3 Announced in Meeting the Childcare Challenge: a Framework and Consultation Document Cmnd 3959 May 1998 London: HMSO 4 Nick Pearce and Will Paxton ‘Introduction’ in Social Justice, p. xxi. 2

Authors: Wincott, Daniel.
first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last



background image
INTRODUCTION
No consensus has developed among analysts of UK politics on the characterization of
the New Labour governments. Many regard Labour as operating within, and basically
constrained by, the political economy framework consolidated over the previous 18
years of Conservative government. Colin Hay punningly encapsulated this continuity
from Major to Blair as ‘Blaijorism’.
Those more closely identified with ‘New’
Labour emphasize its novelty as a ‘Third Way’ between neoliberal and ‘old-style’
Labour; Giddens’ attempt to capture the zeitgeist after the 1997 election landslide was
nonetheless subtitled ‘The Renewal of Social Democracy’.
differences of interpretation encompass both economic and social policies, only the
latter are considered in any detail in this paper, which concentrates on Early
Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) policies. ECEC is, in a sense, a critical
policy; the UK having long been a notorious laggard in this field, soon after its
election New Labour’s National Childcare Strategy (NCS)
made ECEC a state-wide
priority for the first time. Today, (critical) friends of New Labour argue that
‘entitlements to childcare and early years education in a high-quality,
publicly regulated and comprehensive service should form the
centrepiece of progressive institution-building in the early 21
st
century, just as the NHS did in the immediate post-war period’.
That such an ambition can even be stated testifies to the changed in ECEC policy,
given Britain’s long laggardly history in this field. Equally, if even ECEC remains
fundamentally constrained by the pre-Labour policy legacy – or more critically if
New Labour strategy is itself ‘neoliberal’ – then any social democratic aspirations
Blair government might have would lack credibility.
1
Colin Hay ‘Blaijorism: Towards a One-Vision Polity’ Political Quarterly 1997, 68, 372-9, see
generally his book The political economy of new Labour: Labouring under false pretences?
Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.
2
Anthony Giddens The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy Cambridge: Polity, 1997.
While the ‘Third Way’ phrase has fallen out of fashion somewhat, we shall see that the notion of
striking a new path between previously incompatible alternatives remains a motif of self-styled
progressives on the British center-left. Their latest slogan - that Britain has an ‘Anglo-Social’ regime –
is developed in the showcase publication of the Institute for Public Policy Research, Nick Pearce and
Will Paxton, eds, Social Justice: Building a Fairer Britain London: Politico’s Publishing, 2005, and
will be interrogated below.
3
Announced in Meeting the Childcare Challenge: a Framework and Consultation Document Cmnd
3959 May 1998 London: HMSO
4
Nick Pearce and Will Paxton ‘Introduction’ in Social Justice, p. xxi.
2


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.