All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy? Universalist childcare ambitions in Europe's most liberal welfare regime.
Unformatted Document Text:  orthodox position, Labour’s stated ambition to provide a universal ECEC entitlement appears paradoxical; the two should not be able to co-exist. The next section addresses these ‘paradoxes’ in New Labour’s policy record for ECEC. Critical perspectives on this record see it as part of a liberal strategy of ‘recommodification’ or perhaps as insubstantial, at best a fig-leaf for New Labour’s neoliberalism. More sympathetic critics argue that New Labour’s genuine ambitions for ECEC have been thwarted, perhaps inevitably, by the liberal structure of the British welfare state. By contrast, as we have seen, New Labour’s proponents see it as a (potential) cornerstone for a new ‘Anglo-Social’ welfare state. Additionally, I consider the ways in which devolution is implicated in ECEC policy. In fact, analysis suggests that New Labour’s approach towards both ECEC and devolution is considerably more complex and less considered – indeed more ambiguous or contradictory than most of these arguments suggest. Compelling evidence suggests that Labour’s initial ECEC moves were inadequate to the scale of the challenge, particularly in view of ‘liberal’ features of the policy context, and also showed significant recommodificatory features. Of course, we should not assume that new social policies, even of a recommodificatory character, are easily constructed. If British ECEC has subsequently developed in a more expansive direction from such an unpromising foundation is, perhaps, even more remarkable. NEW LABOUR: THE ECEC POLICY RECORD When Labour came to power in 1997, Britain was arguably right at the bottom of the ECEC league table: childcare was the sootiest of British Cinderella services. By 2005 the government claimed to have funded an additional 520,000 sustainable childcare places and provided access to a free nursery place for every three- or four- year-old child. 21 Their 2005 general election manifesto committed Labour to achieve ‘Universal childcare’ by 2010. Specifically, they argued that a re-elected Labour government would ‘create 3,500 Sure Start Children’s Centres for children under five years – five in every constituency – a universal local service that brings together 21 Labour Party Britain Forward not Back: The Labour Party manifesto 2005 London: Labour Party, 2005, p. 76 9

Authors: Wincott, Daniel.
first   previous   Page 9 of 28   next   last



background image
orthodox position, Labour’s stated ambition to provide a universal ECEC entitlement
appears paradoxical; the two should not be able to co-exist.
The next section addresses these ‘paradoxes’ in New Labour’s policy record for
ECEC. Critical perspectives on this record see it as part of a liberal strategy of
‘recommodification’ or perhaps as insubstantial, at best a fig-leaf for New Labour’s
neoliberalism. More sympathetic critics argue that New Labour’s genuine ambitions
for ECEC have been thwarted, perhaps inevitably, by the liberal structure of the
British welfare state. By contrast, as we have seen, New Labour’s proponents see it
as a (potential) cornerstone for a new ‘Anglo-Social’ welfare state. Additionally, I
consider the ways in which devolution is implicated in ECEC policy. In fact, analysis
suggests that New Labour’s approach towards both ECEC and devolution is
considerably more complex and less considered – indeed more ambiguous or
contradictory than most of these arguments suggest. Compelling evidence suggests
that Labour’s initial ECEC moves were inadequate to the scale of the challenge,
particularly in view of ‘liberal’ features of the policy context, and also showed
significant recommodificatory features. Of course, we should not assume that new
social policies, even of a recommodificatory character, are easily constructed. If
British ECEC has subsequently developed in a more expansive direction from such an
unpromising foundation is, perhaps, even more remarkable.
NEW LABOUR: THE ECEC POLICY RECORD
When Labour came to power in 1997, Britain was arguably right at the bottom of the
ECEC league table: childcare was the sootiest of British Cinderella services. By 2005
the government claimed to have funded an additional 520,000 sustainable childcare
places and provided access to a free nursery place for every three- or four- year-old
Their 2005 general election manifesto committed Labour to achieve
‘Universal childcare’ by 2010. Specifically, they argued that a re-elected Labour
government would ‘create 3,500 Sure Start Children’s Centres for children under five
years – five in every constituency – a universal local service that brings together
21
Labour Party Britain Forward not Back: The Labour Party manifesto 2005 London: Labour Party,
2005, p. 76
9


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.