All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Man versus the State: The Shifting Boundary of Sovereign Authority
Unformatted Document Text:  This expansion of the territorial jurisdiction over crimes against humanity was codified in the UN Security Council’s adoption of the Statute establishing the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The ICTY Statute gives it authority to prosecute crimes conducted in either inter-state or internal armed conflicts. 71 The temporal expansion was institutionalized in the Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the International Criminal Court. The ICTR and ICC statutes do not require that the acts be conducted in times of armed conflict, only that they be “part of a widespread or systematic attack on any civilian population.” 72 All three stipulate that no state can conduct either genocide or crimes against humanity. 73 Regardless of whether a state of armed conflict is in existence, these crimes are justiciable, and starting with Nuremberg, there is no statute of limitations on when individuals can be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. Another incursion on the traditional boundaries of sovereignty and sovereign immunity that Nuremberg began was that of individual responsibility for state-sanctioned crimes. The Nuremberg Tribunal, ICTY, ICTR and ICC all enshrine the principle that not only are those in official command responsible for crimes, but so are the individuals who actually commit or aid and abet these crimes. This further erodes the sovereign state’s ability to shelter its 71 ICTY Statute, Article 5, adopted May 25, 1993. 72 Rome Statute of the ICC, Art. 7, adopted July 17, 1998. See also ICTR Statute, Article 3, adopted November 8, 1994. 73 Crimes against humanity are defined in the ICC Statute as “any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: (a) Murder; (b) Extermination; (c) Enslavement; (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population; (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law; (f) Torture; (g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; (h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; (i) Enforced disappearance of persons; (j) The crime of apartheid; (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.” 27

Authors: Clunan, Anne.
first   previous   Page 29 of 35   next   last



background image
This expansion of the territorial jurisdiction over crimes against humanity was
codified in the UN Security Council’s adoption of the Statute establishing the
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The ICTY Statute
gives it authority to prosecute crimes conducted in either inter-state or internal armed
conflicts.
The temporal expansion was institutionalized in the Statute of the
International Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the International Criminal Court. The
ICTR and ICC statutes do not require that the acts be conducted in times of armed
conflict, only that they be “part of a widespread or systematic attack on any civilian
population.”
All three stipulate that no state can conduct either genocide or crimes
against humanity.
Regardless of whether a state of armed conflict is in existence, these
crimes are justiciable, and starting with Nuremberg, there is no statute of limitations on
when individuals can be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. Another incursion on
the traditional boundaries of sovereignty and sovereign immunity that Nuremberg began
was that of individual responsibility for state-sanctioned crimes. The Nuremberg
Tribunal, ICTY, ICTR and ICC all enshrine the principle that not only are those in
official command responsible for crimes, but so are the individuals who actually commit
or aid and abet these crimes. This further erodes the sovereign state’s ability to shelter its
71
ICTY Statute, Article 5, adopted May 25, 1993.
72
Rome Statute of the ICC, Art. 7, adopted July 17, 1998. See also ICTR Statute, Article 3, adopted
November 8, 1994.
73
Crimes against humanity are defined in the ICC Statute as “any of the following acts when committed as
part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the
attack: (a) Murder; (b) Extermination; (c) Enslavement; (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of
international law; (f) Torture; (g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced
sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; (h) Persecution against any
identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined
in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law,
in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons; (j) The crime of apartheid; (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar
character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.”
27


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 35   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.