|
|
|
|
EU Policy Implementation: A Question of Oversight |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Why do European Union (EU) Member States with reputations for supporting deeper integration have so much difficulty implementing EU labor policy? Each year, the European Commission initiates infringement cases against Member States for failure to implement labor policy. Member States’ responses to these cases vary substantially. Why did 29 per cent of infringement cases against France for failure to implement labor policy between 1978 and 2000 reach the European Court of Justice (ECJ) while only 5.8 per cent of cases against Greece went to the ECJ during the same period? Why have 29.2 per cent of cases against Luxembourg ended before the ECJ while only 6.3 per cent of cases against the Netherlands required ECJ action? Existing analyses of European policy implementation do not answer these questions. This article addresses these questions by examining 186 infringement cases and the administrative oversight structures Member State governments use to ensure proper implementation of labor policy. I argue that Member State governments' resolution of infringement cases depends on their ability rather than their willingness to make the changes neccessary to avoid referral to the ECJ. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
govern (164), state (152), european (138), case (132), implement (132), member (131), oversight (108), polici (95), commiss (92), infring (83), eu (66), administr (63), ecj (61), polit (60), ideolog (59), law (57), polic (54), patrol (53), communiti (49), direct (48), integr (46), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Jensen, Christian. "EU Policy Implementation: A Question of Oversight" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40623_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Jensen, C. B. , 2005-09-01 "EU Policy Implementation: A Question of Oversight" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40623_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Why do European Union (EU) Member States with reputations for supporting deeper integration have so much difficulty implementing EU labor policy? Each year, the European Commission initiates infringement cases against Member States for failure to implement labor policy. Member States’ responses to these cases vary substantially. Why did 29 per cent of infringement cases against France for failure to implement labor policy between 1978 and 2000 reach the European Court of Justice (ECJ) while only 5.8 per cent of cases against Greece went to the ECJ during the same period? Why have 29.2 per cent of cases against Luxembourg ended before the ECJ while only 6.3 per cent of cases against the Netherlands required ECJ action? Existing analyses of European policy implementation do not answer these questions. This article addresses these questions by examining 186 infringement cases and the administrative oversight structures Member State governments use to ensure proper implementation of labor policy. I argue that Member State governments' resolution of infringement cases depends on their ability rather than their willingness to make the changes neccessary to avoid referral to the ECJ. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
57 |
| Word count: |
12667 |
| Text sample: |
| Implementing Europe: A Question of Oversight By Christian B. Jensen Christian-Jensen@uiowa.edu Assistant Professor Department of Political Science University of Iowa DRAFT Please do not cite without permission. Why do European Union (EU) Member States with reputations for supporting deeper integration have so much difficulty implementing EU labor policy? Each year the European Commission initiates infringement cases against Member States for failure to implement labor policy. Member States’ responses to these cases vary substantially. Why did 29 per cent of |
| Constraints and High Politics.” In Achilleas Mitsos and Elias Mossialos eds. Contemporary Greece and Europe. Burlington VT: Ashgate Publishers. Tunch Gary. 1998. “Luxembourg: A Small Success Story.” In Anthony Ferner and Richard Hyman eds. Changing Industrial Relations in Europe. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishers. Weis Manfred and Marlene Schmidt. 2000. “Federal Republic of Germany.” In Roger Blanpain ed. International Encyclopedia for Labour Law and Industrial Relations v. 6. London: Kluwer. Wessels Wolfgang and Dietrich Rometsch. 1996. “German Administrative Interaction and |
Similar Titles:
The Dynamics of Delegated Authority: The European Commission, Member States and European Union State Aid Policy
Integrating the Study of European Union Institutions and Policies With an Understanding of the Politics of the Member States in a One Semester Course
|
|