|
|
|
|
Participation through Enforcement. The Case of the European Union |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This article provides a comparative framework for understanding processes of decentralized law enforcement in the European Union (EU). In particular, the analysis proposes how decentralized EU law enforcement mechanisms can increase opportunities for participation of citizens and firms, but only if they possess domestic courts access and sufficient resources to use it. The article undertakes a systematic analysis of non-compliance with EU environmental law to examine this dynamic. The findings reveal a major paradox for the enforcement of EU law: the empowerment of the already powerful. This paradox has major implications for the potential of expanding judicial power in the EU and at the international level to bring more democracy to international politics. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
law (112), environment (99), eu (84), european (81), court (80), enforc (76), group (73), direct (73), opportun (65), legal (65), state (62), access (54), polit (53), particip (52), complianc (50), intern (49), commiss (48), public (47), case (47), citizen (46), member (43), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Compliance, courts, law enforcement, citizen empowerment, legitimacy, European Union |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Boerzel, Tanja. "Participation through Enforcement. The Case of the European Union" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40633_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Boerzel, T. A. , 2005-09-01 "Participation through Enforcement. The Case of the European Union" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p40633_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This article provides a comparative framework for understanding processes of decentralized law enforcement in the European Union (EU). In particular, the analysis proposes how decentralized EU law enforcement mechanisms can increase opportunities for participation of citizens and firms, but only if they possess domestic courts access and sufficient resources to use it. The article undertakes a systematic analysis of non-compliance with EU environmental law to examine this dynamic. The findings reveal a major paradox for the enforcement of EU law: the empowerment of the already powerful. This paradox has major implications for the potential of expanding judicial power in the EU and at the international level to bring more democracy to international politics. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
32 |
| Word count: |
9939 |
| Text sample: |
| PARTICIPATION THROUGH LAW ENFORCEMENT THE CASE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION* Tanja A. Börzel Free University of Berlin Paper prepared for presentation at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association Washington D.C. September 1-4 2005. Abstract This article provides a comparative framework for understanding processes of decentralized law enforcement in the European Union (EU). In particular the analysis proposes how decentralized EU law enforcement mechanisms can increase opportunities for participation of citizens and firms but only if they |
| A 92.40061 8 A 92.40062 8 A 92.40066 8 A 92.0068 (Art. 234 preliminary ruling C-396/92; Verwaltungsgerichtshof München Urteil vom 26.1.1993 8 A 92/40143; Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg Urteil vom 11.6.1993 8 S 1995/92; Bundesverwaltungsgericht Beschluss vom 18.5.1994 4 NB 15/94; Bundesverwaltungsgericht Beschluss vom 25.1.1996 4 C 5/95; Bundesverwaltungsgericht Beschluss vom 23.4.1996 11 B 96/95; Bundesverwaltungsgericht Urteil vom 14.5.1997 11 A 43/96; Bundesverwaltungsgericht Urteil vom 22.9.1997 4 B 147/97; Bundesverfassungsgericht Beschluss vom 11.6.2003 1 BvR 1796/02. 18 Sentencia 106/91 de la |
Similar Titles:
The Politics of State Law Enforcement: Examining State Amici Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Criminal Procedure Cases
State Supreme Courts and the Political Environment:How Interest Group Participation Influences State Policy-Making
|
|