All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Rabid Chess and the Radical Resolution of Entrenched Disputes
Unformatted Document Text:  chess to argue that the international system, much like the game of chess, is governed by rules and norms that constitute its identity. Thus John Ruggie argues that “if we are asked to ‘explain’ the game of chess, the appropriate response consists of its constitutive rules,” and that “precisely the same holds for ‘explaining’ modern international politics in contrast to Medieval or classical Greek systems…” 4 Realists and materialists on the other hand have argued that the international system is unlike chess: it is governed only by regulative rules that are constantly challenged and changed by member states. Thus Stephen Krasner has argued that any constitutive rules that we might attribute to the international system are in fact continuously defied without leaving a dramatic impact on the nature of the system, and thus cannot be constitutive: “The designated moves for each chess piece are the constitutive rules of chess. Moving a Bishop in a straight line is a violation of one of these rules; It is not chess if a Bishop is not moved along a diagonal. In contrast, alternatives to sovereign statehood have been accommodated in the international system over the past several hundred years.” 5 Realists, adopting a strict and static definition of constitutive rules, would argue that if one is playing chess with dice, with more than two players per board or with Bishops that can leap over other pieces, then one is not playing chess but something substantially different. But chess was, until the 14 th century, played with dice. 6 It was originally played by four players. 7 The Bishop, until 500 years ago, did leap over other pieces. He did not even exist as a piece on the board for a majority of the history of the game. The rules of chess which we consider constitutive of the game today were not 4 John Gerard Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity, (London: Routledge, 1998), p.24. 5 Stephen Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p.229 6 Golombek, p.19. 7 Anne Sunnucks (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Chess, (Robert Hale, London, 1976), p.39. 3

Authors: Hassner, Ron.
first   previous   Page 3 of 30   next   last



background image
chess to argue that the international system, much like the game of chess, is governed by
rules and norms that constitute its identity. Thus John Ruggie argues that “if we are
asked to ‘explain’ the game of chess, the appropriate response consists of its constitutive
rules,” and that “precisely the same holds for ‘explaining’ modern international politics in
contrast to Medieval or classical Greek systems…”
Realists and materialists on the
other hand have argued that the international system is unlike chess: it is governed only
by regulative rules that are constantly challenged and changed by member states. Thus
Stephen Krasner has argued that any constitutive rules that we might attribute to the
international system are in fact continuously defied without leaving a dramatic impact on
the nature of the system, and thus cannot be constitutive: “The designated moves for
each chess piece are the constitutive rules of chess. Moving a Bishop in a straight line is
a violation of one of these rules; It is not chess if a Bishop is not moved along a diagonal.
In contrast, alternatives to sovereign statehood have been accommodated in the
international system over the past several hundred years.”
Realists, adopting a strict and static definition of constitutive rules, would argue
that if one is playing chess with dice, with more than two players per board or with
Bishops that can leap over other pieces, then one is not playing chess but something
substantially different. But chess was, until the 14
th
century, played with dice.
It was
originally played by four players.
The Bishop, until 500 years ago, did leap over other
pieces. He did not even exist as a piece on the board for a majority of the history of the
game. The rules of chess which we consider constitutive of the game today were not
4
John Gerard Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity, (London: Routledge, 1998), p.24.
5
Stephen Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p.229
6
Golombek, p.19.
7
Anne Sunnucks (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Chess, (Robert Hale, London, 1976), p.39.
3


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.