All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Bargaining for Autonomy: Why States and Self-Determination Movements Fail
Unformatted Document Text:  19 preferences over autonomy and differences in political institutions can create significant barriers to the ability of each side to bargain and reach an agreement. Given this model of self-determination politics, I am able to make a number of predictions about when autonomy agreements will be more or less likely. The following hypotheses are derived from the theory presented above. I present the hypotheses in two sets: predictions about the effects of state characteristics and predictions about the effects of group characteristics. Internal Characteristics of States Internal divisions make it more difficult for states to bargain over autonomy and reach an autonomy agreement. Because any disadvantaged factions must be compensated prior to a successful agreement, the internal bargain between state factions becomes more difficult to resolve when there are greater numbers of factions. However, the existence of multiple veto factions in the state can also enhance the ability of the state to commit credibly to a new autonomy agreement. The relationship between veto factions and agreements over autonomy will therefore be non-linear, with agreements being made in the middle cases where there is more than one, but not many veto factions. 28 Hypothesis 1: Agreement is most likely when there are a moderate number of veto factions. Additionally, two other factors affect the ability of state factions to be adequately compensated for potential loses due to a new autonomy agreement, and therefore the likelihood of agreement. These factors are the size of potential losses and sufficiency of the state’s resources. This leads to hypotheses two and three. Hypothesis 2: The higher the rents from the contested territory, the less likely the state/group dyad is to reach an agreement. Hypothesis 3: The lower the amount of fungible resources the state has, the less likely the state/group dyad is to reach an agreement. 28 Empirically, a moderate number of veto players is 2 – 4 inclusive. This is value that the middle 50% of cases takes on.

Authors: Cunningham, Kathleen.
first   previous   Page 19 of 42   next   last



background image
19
preferences over autonomy and differences in political institutions can create significant barriers to
the ability of each side to bargain and reach an agreement.
Given this model of self-determination politics, I am able to make a number of predictions
about when autonomy agreements will be more or less likely. The following hypotheses are derived
from the theory presented above. I present the hypotheses in two sets: predictions about the effects
of state characteristics and predictions about the effects of group characteristics.
Internal Characteristics of States
Internal divisions make it more difficult for states to bargain over autonomy and reach an
autonomy agreement. Because any disadvantaged factions must be compensated prior to a
successful agreement, the internal bargain between state factions becomes more difficult to resolve
when there are greater numbers of factions. However, the existence of multiple veto factions in the
state can also enhance the ability of the state to commit credibly to a new autonomy agreement. The
relationship between veto factions and agreements over autonomy will therefore be non-linear, with
agreements being made in the middle cases where there is more than one, but not many veto
factions.
28
Hypothesis 1: Agreement is most likely when there are a moderate number of veto factions.

Additionally, two other factors affect the ability of state factions to be adequately
compensated for potential loses due to a new autonomy agreement, and therefore the likelihood of
agreement. These factors are the size of potential losses and sufficiency of the state’s resources.
This leads to hypotheses two and three.
Hypothesis 2: The higher the rents from the contested territory, the less likely the state/group dyad is to reach
an agreement.

Hypothesis 3: The lower the amount of fungible resources the state has, the less likely the state/group dyad is
to reach an agreement.
28
Empirically, a moderate number of veto players is 2 – 4 inclusive. This is value that the middle 50% of cases takes on.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 42   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.