All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Bargaining for Autonomy: Why States and Self-Determination Movements Fail
Unformatted Document Text:  2 Introduction In 1991, the Chechen republic declared independence from Russia, beginning a separatist conflict that has claimed an estimated 115,000 lives to date. Between 1994 and 2003, negotiations between separatist factions and the Russian state were attempted five times, culminating in two peace accords in 1996 and 1997. Yet, after a short respite, the conflict renewed, generating over 70,000 battle deaths since the accords. Disputes over self-determination have become some of the most common conflicts in the international system and have shown significant resistance to settlement. Both states and self- determination groups have shown remarkable willingness to negotiate over autonomy, but comparatively few pairs have been able to reach new agreements on satisfactory levels of autonomy. Even among pairs that have been able to reach agreements, only 9% of these agreements are fully implemented, while over 60% of all signed deals remained contested in 2003. 2 Moreover, in the past two decades, over 35 self-determination disputes have degenerated into full-scale secessionist war (such as the Chechens in Russia, East Timorese in Indonesia, and the Eritreans in Ethiopia). This paper seeks to answer the question: Why can some pairs of states and self-determination groups reach and implement agreement over autonomy while so many others are unable to do so? Moreover, what factors make agreement more likely at any specific point in an ongoing dispute over self-determination? If we can understand the factors affecting the success and failure of these attempts to manage self-determination claims, we will significantly advance our understanding of a major source of violent conflict today. The intractability of these disputes may be a result of their very nature - that conflict over political autonomy (frequently tied to territorial homeland and nationalism) is intrinsically different that other types of contested politics. These disputes challenge the legitimacy of a state’s authority, 2 Based on the CIDCM Peace and Conflict 2003 Report.

Authors: Cunningham, Kathleen.
first   previous   Page 2 of 42   next   last



background image
2
Introduction
In 1991, the Chechen republic declared independence from Russia, beginning a separatist
conflict that has claimed an estimated 115,000 lives to date. Between 1994 and 2003, negotiations
between separatist factions and the Russian state were attempted five times, culminating in two
peace accords in 1996 and 1997. Yet, after a short respite, the conflict renewed, generating over
70,000 battle deaths since the accords.
Disputes over self-determination have become some of the most common conflicts in the
international system and have shown significant resistance to settlement. Both states and self-
determination groups have shown remarkable willingness to negotiate over autonomy, but
comparatively few pairs have been able to reach new agreements on satisfactory levels of autonomy.
Even among pairs that have been able to reach agreements, only 9% of these agreements are fully
implemented, while over 60% of all signed deals remained contested in 2003.
2
Moreover, in the past
two decades, over 35 self-determination disputes have degenerated into full-scale secessionist war
(such as the Chechens in Russia, East Timorese in Indonesia, and the Eritreans in Ethiopia). This
paper seeks to answer the question: Why can some pairs of states and self-determination groups
reach and implement agreement over autonomy while so many others are unable to do so?
Moreover, what factors make agreement more likely at any specific point in an ongoing dispute over
self-determination? If we can understand the factors affecting the success and failure of these
attempts to manage self-determination claims, we will significantly advance our understanding of a
major source of violent conflict today.
The intractability of these disputes may be a result of their very nature - that conflict over
political autonomy (frequently tied to territorial homeland and nationalism) is intrinsically different
that other types of contested politics. These disputes challenge the legitimacy of a state’s authority,
2
Based on the CIDCM Peace and Conflict 2003 Report.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 42   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.