All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Justice Lost! Why Bad States Do Good Things (But Why It May Not Matter)
Unformatted Document Text:  2 By almost any measure, nearly one out of two of the world’s governments today are repressive; systematically denying human beings living in their borders rights to be free from murder, torture, or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; prolonged detention without charges; disappearance or clandestine detention; free and fair elections; and other flagrant violations of the right to life, liberty, and the security of the person. 2 Many scholars and policymakers have been working to bring these governments to justice, trying to figure out what kind of human rights policies can make repressors accountable for their actions and stop future abuses (Koh 2002). Unfortunately, their primary political tools, international human rights laws, have so far not led to a world free from violence or abuse, and individuals today are no more protected today than thirty years ago. Our concern in this paper is with the efficacy of these laws to reform those actors most in violation, “bad” states, whose governments repress or allow repression of human beings within their borders. International human rights laws are legal instruments designed commonly by the United Nations to outlaw repressive practices and commit governments all over the world to reforms, voluntarily. There is not simply one type or form of international law to protect human rights; international legalization displays great variations, from hard to soft laws. Hard laws are legally binding obligations that are precise but that also delegate authority for interpretation and implementation (Keohane, Moravcsik, and Slaughter 2001). Soft laws are weaker along one or more of these dimensions: obligations, in the 2 Amnesty International reported on 168 states in 2003; 81 were observed to commit significant acts of repression. The US State Department reported on 176 states in 2003; 88 were observed to commit significant acts of repression. Freedom House reported on 188 states in 2003; 81 were observed to commit significant acts of repression. These data will be explored in greater detail in the section on data.

Authors: Hafner-Burton, Emilie.
first   previous   Page 2 of 43   next   last



background image
2
By almost any measure, nearly one out of two of the world’s governments today are
repressive; systematically denying human beings living in their borders rights to be free
from murder, torture, or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment;
prolonged detention without charges; disappearance or clandestine detention; free and
fair elections; and other flagrant violations of the right to life, liberty, and the security of
the person.
2
Many scholars and policymakers have been working to bring these
governments to justice, trying to figure out what kind of human rights policies can make
repressors accountable for their actions and stop future abuses (Koh 2002). Unfortunately,
their primary political tools, international human rights laws, have so far not led to a
world free from violence or abuse, and individuals today are no more protected today
than thirty years ago. Our concern in this paper is with the efficacy of these laws to
reform those actors most in violation, “bad” states, whose governments repress or allow
repression of human beings within their borders.
International human rights laws are legal instruments designed commonly by the
United Nations to outlaw repressive practices and commit governments all over the world
to reforms, voluntarily. There is not simply one type or form of international law to
protect human rights; international legalization displays great variations, from hard to soft
laws. Hard laws are legally binding obligations that are precise but that also delegate
authority for interpretation and implementation (Keohane, Moravcsik, and Slaughter
2001). Soft laws are weaker along one or more of these dimensions: obligations, in the
2
Amnesty International reported on 168 states in 2003; 81 were observed to commit
significant acts of repression. The US State Department reported on 176 states in 2003;
88 were observed to commit significant acts of repression. Freedom House reported on
188 states in 2003; 81 were observed to commit significant acts of repression. These data
will be explored in greater detail in the section on data.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 43   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.