All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Welfare Politics in Congress
Unformatted Document Text:  Mead 27 activist, civil rights, and religious organizations, do continue to raise progressive issues, but even they pay rising attention to paternalist questions. So the changes in discourse are broad-based. Determinants of the Agenda As suggested above, the reasons for the agenda shift ultimately lie outside welfare politics—in trends in national politics and the society. But some correlates of the key framings can be found within the current data. I built models of whether witnesses mentioned progressivism or paternalism as their leading issue, and whether they mentioned these issue types at all. Tables 4-7 show the results (see Appendix for descriptive statistics on the variables). 38 Since a paternalist emphasis seems to grow over the whole span of the welfare controversy, I interpret the stage of reform as a continuous, five-step variable. As an explainer, this term dominates most of these models, accounting for the lion’s share of the explained variation all by itself. Table 4: Model of whether a witness cited progressivism as leading issue: Coeff Std. error z score P>|z| Effect Stage of welfare reform: -.554 .062 -8.94 .000 -.568 Witness was left on leading issue: .575 .155 3.70 .000 .204 Hearing occurred in Senate: -.403 .134 -3.01 .003 -.131 Witness was from the administration: -.758 .241 -3.15 .002 -.289 Witness was an academic: -1.14 .354 -3.22 .001 -.416 Constant: 2.39 N 527 Log likelihood -255.0 Pseudo R 2 .237 Note: Effects are Clarify estimates of the change in the chance that a witness cites progressive as leading issue resulting from a change in this variable from its lowest to highest value. Table 4 shows that the chance a witness would adopt progressivism as his or her leading issue was strongly depressed by the stage of reform, although somewhat raised if the witness took a left 38 These models were assembled with limited fitted and confined to terms significant at .05 or better. I began with the stage of reform term, then added ideology and—if significant—the Senate term. I then added such witness terms as were significant when added to the terms already in the model.

Authors: Mead, Lawrence.
first   previous   Page 29 of 37   next   last



background image
Mead 27
activist, civil rights, and religious organizations, do continue to raise progressive issues, but even
they pay rising attention to paternalist questions. So the changes in discourse are broad-based.
Determinants of the Agenda
As suggested above, the reasons for the agenda shift ultimately lie outside welfare politics—in
trends in national politics and the society. But some correlates of the key framings can be found
within the current data. I built models of whether witnesses mentioned progressivism or paternalism
as their leading issue, and whether they mentioned these issue types at all. Tables 4-7 show the
results (see Appendix for descriptive statistics on the variables).
Since a paternalist emphasis seems to grow over the whole span of the welfare controversy, I
interpret the stage of reform as a continuous, five-step variable. As an explainer, this term
dominates most of these models, accounting for the lion’s share of the explained variation all by
itself.
Table 4: Model of whether a witness cited progressivism as leading issue:
Coeff
Std.
error
z score
P>|z|
Effect
Stage of welfare reform:
-.554
.062
-8.94
.000
-.568
Witness was left on leading issue:
.575
.155
3.70
.000
.204
Hearing occurred in Senate:
-.403
.134
-3.01
.003
-.131
Witness was from the administration:
-.758
.241
-3.15
.002
-.289
Witness was an academic:
-1.14
.354
-3.22
.001
-.416
Constant:
2.39
N
527
Log likelihood
-255.0
Pseudo R
2
.237
Note: Effects are Clarify estimates of the change in the chance that a witness cites progressive as
leading issue resulting from a change in this variable from its lowest to highest value.
Table 4 shows that the chance a witness would adopt progressivism as his or her leading issue
was strongly depressed by the stage of reform, although somewhat raised if the witness took a left
38
These models were assembled with limited fitted and confined to terms significant at .05 or better. I
began with the stage of reform term, then added ideology and—if significant—the Senate term. I then added
such witness terms as were significant when added to the terms already in the model.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.