All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Campaign Finance Laws and Candidacy Decisions in State Legislative Elections
Unformatted Document Text:  Table 2 Logistic Regression Analyses of Factors Affecting the Probability of a Major Party Challenge To an Incumbent in Either a Primary or General Election in 25 States (1994-98) Probability 1 2 3 4 5 Change District-Level Factors Past Electoral Competitiveness .036*** .035*** .035*** .034*** .034*** +.283 Partisan Homogeneity .001 .002 .002 .002 .002 +.006 Social Diversity -.405 .093 .340 -.472 -.285 -.005 Population -.002 + .001 .001 .004** .004** +.074 Urban .053 .061 .043 .088 .075 +.017 System-Level Conditions Legislative Professionalism 2.673*** 3.108*** 2.771*** 2.063*** 1.851*** +.096 Chamber Competition .006* .003 .006 + .003 .005 +.024 Election Context 1996 .328*** .333*** .290*** .332*** .301*** +.066 1998 -.201** -.191** -.253*** -.201** -.244*** -.055 Filing Requirements ----- -.200*** -.242*** -.286*** -.312*** -.142 Campaign Finance Laws Limitation Index ----- ----- .061** ----- .043* +.048 Public Funding ----- ----- ----- .764*** .732*** +.147 Constant -.861** -.900** -1.207*** -.670* -.892** N = 6,120 6,120 6,120 6,120 6,120 Base Pseudo R 2 = .122 .124 .126 .131 .132 Probability Correctly Predicted = 68% 68% 68% 64% 68% .661 + p < .10; * p < .05; ** p <.01; *** p < .001 29

Authors: Hogan, Robert. and Hamm, Keith.
first   previous   Page 29 of 30   next   last



background image
Table 2
Logistic Regression Analyses of Factors Affecting the Probability of a Major Party Challenge
To an Incumbent in Either a Primary or General Election in 25 States (1994-98)
Probability
1
2
3
4
5
Change
District-Level
Factors
Past Electoral Competitiveness
.036***
.035***
.035***
.034***
.034***
+.283
Partisan Homogeneity
.001
.002
.002
.002
.002
+.006
Social Diversity
-.405
.093
.340
-.472
-.285
-.005
Population
-.002
+
.001
.001
.004**
.004**
+.074
Urban
.053
.061
.043
.088
.075
+.017
System-Level
Conditions
Legislative Professionalism
2.673***
3.108***
2.771***
2.063***
1.851***
+.096
Chamber Competition
.006*
.003
.006
+
.003
.005
+.024
Election Context
1996
.328***
.333***
.290***
.332***
.301***
+.066
1998
-.201**
-.191**
-.253***
-.201**
-.244***
-.055
Filing Requirements
-----
-.200***
-.242***
-.286***
-.312***
-.142
Campaign
Finance Laws
Limitation Index
-----
-----
.061**
-----
.043*
+.048
Public Funding
-----
-----
-----
.764***
.732***
+.147
Constant
-.861**
-.900**
-1.207***
-.670*
-.892**
N =
6,120
6,120
6,120
6,120
6,120
Base
Pseudo R
2
=
.122
.124
.126
.131
.132
Probability
Correctly Predicted =
68%
68%
68%
64%
68%
.661

+ p < .10; * p < .05; ** p <.01; *** p < .001
29


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.