All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"The Mouse the Roared": Agenda Setting in Canadian Pesticides Policy
Unformatted Document Text:  responsibilities and tightened restrictions on pesticides for environmental and health reasons. Finally, the legislative reform process had involved consultations with, and the cooperation of key stakeholders such as industry, environmental groups, and health organizations—a significant departure from the more closed policy making processes of the past (see VanNijnatten 1999). Yet all this federal activity on pesticides policy reform was arguably the less significant development in pesticides politics in Canada during the 1990s and early 2000s. By the time the Pest Control Products Act passed in 2002, over fifty municipalities throughout Canada had passed bylaws banning or restricting “non-essential” uses of lawn and garden chemicals on public and private property. The municipal bylaw movement, unlike the federal activity on pesticides, was highly public and conflict-ridden; the relatively polite conversations in federal pesticides advisory committees (which included industry and environmentalists) were supplanted at the local level by often heated debates in front of city councils. And for good reason: at the local level, the industry was facing the possibility of outright bans of its products, rather than statements about their relative risks. And while the bylaw movement began small, it spread rather rapidly. Large cities as well as small towns joined the bylaw bandwagon: in 2000, Halifax became the largest municipality to pass a bylaw, and the cities of Montreal, Vancouver, and Toronto followed. In 2002, Quebec Province restricted the use of lawn and garden pesticides 1 on public and private land throughout the province, signifying the potential for the movement to “trickle up” to higher levels of government. This paper examines the municipal pesticide bylaws campaign in Canada from an agenda-setting perspective. How did the issue of lawn and garden pesticides get on the agendas of local municipalities? What accounts for the success of the movement? The analysis focuses on strategies of issue definition and venue shopping, key components of Baumgartner and Jones’ 1 I use the term “pesticides” generically to refer to chemical compounds used to kill unwanted plants or animals. Pesticides include herbicides, insecticides, rodenticides, and fungicides. 3

Authors: Pralle, Sarah.
first   previous   Page 3 of 41   next   last



background image
responsibilities and tightened restrictions on pesticides for environmental and health reasons.
Finally, the legislative reform process had involved consultations with, and the cooperation of
key stakeholders such as industry, environmental groups, and health organizations—a significant
departure from the more closed policy making processes of the past (see VanNijnatten 1999).
Yet all this federal activity on pesticides policy reform was arguably the less significant
development in pesticides politics in Canada during the 1990s and early 2000s. By the time the
Pest Control Products Act passed in 2002, over fifty municipalities throughout Canada had
passed bylaws banning or restricting “non-essential” uses of lawn and garden chemicals on
public and private property. The municipal bylaw movement, unlike the federal activity on
pesticides, was highly public and conflict-ridden; the relatively polite conversations in federal
pesticides advisory committees (which included industry and environmentalists) were supplanted
at the local level by often heated debates in front of city councils. And for good reason: at the
local level, the industry was facing the possibility of outright bans of its products, rather than
statements about their relative risks. And while the bylaw movement began small, it spread
rather rapidly. Large cities as well as small towns joined the bylaw bandwagon: in 2000, Halifax
became the largest municipality to pass a bylaw, and the cities of Montreal, Vancouver, and
Toronto followed. In 2002, Quebec Province restricted the use of lawn and garden pesticides
on
public and private land throughout the province, signifying the potential for the movement to
“trickle up” to higher levels of government.
This paper examines the municipal pesticide bylaws campaign in Canada from an
agenda-setting perspective. How did the issue of lawn and garden pesticides get on the agendas
of local municipalities? What accounts for the success of the movement? The analysis focuses on
strategies of issue definition and venue shopping, key components of Baumgartner and Jones’
1
I use the term “pesticides” generically to refer to chemical compounds used to kill unwanted plants or animals.
Pesticides include herbicides, insecticides, rodenticides, and fungicides.
3


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 41   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.