All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Garbage In, Garbage Out: Virginia is For Landfills
Unformatted Document Text:  Abstract Sometime in the late 1990s the state of Virginia earned a new, dubious distinction as the second-largest importer of trash in the United States, trailing only its northern neighbor, the state of Pennsylvania. Virginia and Pennsylvania are not alone in this regard. Imported trash has become big business in many other states as well. For ten years the United States Congress has entertained, but has never passed, bills that would allow the states to constrain the interstate movement of garbage. The various legislative proposals to date all revolve around a central question: should we restrict the interstate trade of trash? This question might seem odd when considered against the backdrop of modern environmental policymaking. Forty years ago we still wondered if we should leave pollution control in the hands of state and local agencies, but since then it has been widely accepted that we should control the generation of pollution that can move across political jurisdictions. At the root of this puzzling question is the fact that policymakers are conflicted over whether to regard trash as commerce, which should be encouraged, or as pollution, which should be discouraged. One of us (Thomson) addresses this dilemma in an ongoing book project, Garbage In, Garbage Out: Virginia is For Landfills. In this paper we explain why long-distance trash transport is on the rise in the United States and we describe the legislative remedies that have been proposed in the Congress. We observe that, while Congress has delegated municipal waste management to the state and local agencies, they are currently handicapped in their ability to control the movement of waste over their borders. At present, policymaking for waste management in the United States remains much more about fostering commerce than about controlling pollution. We frame our discussion of these issues through selected comparisons with waste generation and management patterns in western Europe and Japan, where the principles of proximity, harmonization, equity, and pollution prevention provide the foundation for waste management policies. 2

Authors: Thomson, Vivian. and Okuda, Itaru.
first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last



background image
Abstract
Sometime in the late 1990s the state of Virginia earned a new, dubious distinction
as the second-largest importer of trash in the United States, trailing only its northern
neighbor, the state of Pennsylvania. Virginia and Pennsylvania are not alone in this regard.
Imported trash has become big business in many other states as well.
For ten years the United States Congress has entertained, but has never passed,
bills that would allow the states to constrain the interstate movement of garbage. The
various legislative proposals to date all revolve around a central question: should we
restrict the interstate trade of trash? This question might seem odd when considered
against the backdrop of modern environmental policymaking. Forty years ago we still
wondered if we should leave pollution control in the hands of state and local agencies, but
since then it has been widely accepted that we should control the generation of pollution
that can move across political jurisdictions.
At the root of this puzzling question is the fact that policymakers are conflicted
over whether to regard trash as commerce, which should be encouraged, or as pollution,
which should be discouraged. One of us (Thomson) addresses this dilemma in an ongoing
book project,
Garbage In, Garbage Out: Virginia is For Landfills.
In this paper we explain why long-distance trash transport is on the rise in the
United States and we describe the legislative remedies that have been proposed in the
Congress. We observe that, while Congress has delegated municipal waste management to
the state and local agencies, they are currently handicapped in their ability to control the
movement of waste over their borders. At present, policymaking for waste management
in the United States remains much more about fostering commerce than about controlling
pollution. We frame our discussion of these issues through selected comparisons with
waste generation and management patterns in western Europe and Japan, where the
principles of proximity, harmonization, equity, and pollution prevention provide the
foundation for waste management policies.
2


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.