All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Mapping the Policies of the U.S. Supreme Court
Unformatted Document Text:  8 problem that can be quickly and easily handled. 1 The researcher need not even understand the language in which the documents she is analyzing are written! The intuition underlying the procedure can be illustrated by considering an extreme example. Suppose someone who does not speak English is presented with two written opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court. One is authored by a justice who is ideologically conservative, while the other is the written by a more liberal justice. Upon closer inspection, such a person might discover that the two texts --- which the reader cannot understand --- make use of systematically different language. The words “rational,” “legitimate,” and “intent,” for example, appear frequently in the opinion of the conservative justice, but only once in a while in the other opinion. The words “strict,” “discrimination,” and “equality,” on the other hand, are more frequent in the liberal justice’s opinion but hardly appear in the other opinion. Our observer is then handed a new set of documents and is told that they are the written opinions of the other seven members of the Supreme Court but about whose ideological positions nothing is known. What would the observer conclude about the likely location of the justices on the right-left continuum? The thrust of the Wordscore procedure is the claim that one can make use of the frequencies with which different words appear in the different texts to draw some conclusions. For example, if one were to observe that one of the opinions made heavy use of words primarily found in the conservative justice’s opinion and infrequent use of words that are typical for the opinion of the liberal justice, one would draw the conclusion that that new opinion probably expresses a position that is closer to the position of the right-leaning justice than the left-leaning justices. In other words, even in the absence of understanding the meaning of any of the words in the documents, one could make use of the similarity in word use in documents whose positions one 1 The procedure is currently available as an add-on to STATA, which the authors have made available.

Authors: McGuire, Kevin.
first   previous   Page 9 of 37   next   last



background image
8
problem that can be quickly and easily handled.
1
The researcher need not even understand the
language in which the documents she is analyzing are written!
The intuition underlying the procedure can be illustrated by considering an extreme
example. Suppose someone who does not speak English is presented with two written opinions of
the U.S. Supreme Court. One is authored by a justice who is ideologically conservative, while the
other is the written by a more liberal justice. Upon closer inspection, such a person might discover
that the two texts --- which the reader cannot understand --- make use of systematically different
language. The words “rational,” “legitimate,” and “intent,” for example, appear frequently in the
opinion of the conservative justice, but only once in a while in the other opinion. The words
“strict,” “discrimination,” and “equality,” on the other hand, are more frequent in the liberal
justice’s opinion but hardly appear in the other opinion.
Our observer is then handed a new set of documents and is told that they are the written
opinions of the other seven members of the Supreme Court but about whose ideological positions
nothing is known. What would the observer conclude about the likely location of the justices on the
right-left continuum? The thrust of the Wordscore procedure is the claim that one can make use of
the frequencies with which different words appear in the different texts to draw some conclusions.
For example, if one were to observe that one of the opinions made heavy use of words primarily
found in the conservative justice’s opinion and infrequent use of words that are typical for the
opinion of the liberal justice, one would draw the conclusion that that new opinion probably
expresses a position that is closer to the position of the right-leaning justice than the left-leaning
justices. In other words, even in the absence of understanding the meaning of any of the words in
the documents, one could make use of the similarity in word use in documents whose positions one
1
The procedure is currently available as an add-on to STATA, which the authors have made available.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.