|
|
|
|
Jurisprudential Regimes and Obscenity Doctrine |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP!
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper builds on a body of research devoted to developing the concept of “jurisprudential regimes,” which tangibly constrain Supreme Court decision making by framing the central issues considered by the justices in particular areas of the law. More specifically, it applies the jurisprudential regime construct to obscenity doctrine and tests whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973) established a jurisprudential regime in that area of the law. It finds that while the justices’ ideological preferences are strong predictors of their votes in obscenity cases, there is substantial evidence that the framework announced in Miller does affect their voting behavior. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
miller (99), justic (95), court (71), case (63), obscen (63), v (56), vote (50), model (47), suprem (44), regim (40), u.s (36), jurisprudenti (36), state (34), variabl (34), test (32), polit (32), materi (30), segal (24), decis (23), 1 (23), law (22), |
Author's Keywords:
|
jurisprudential regime, United States Supreme Court, obscenity, judicial behavior |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Buchman, Jeremy. "Jurisprudential Regimes and Obscenity Doctrine" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41143_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Buchman, J. , 2005-09-01 "Jurisprudential Regimes and Obscenity Doctrine" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41143_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: This paper builds on a body of research devoted to developing the concept of “jurisprudential regimes,” which tangibly constrain Supreme Court decision making by framing the central issues considered by the justices in particular areas of the law. More specifically, it applies the jurisprudential regime construct to obscenity doctrine and tests whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973) established a jurisprudential regime in that area of the law. It finds that while the justices’ ideological preferences are strong predictors of their votes in obscenity cases, there is substantial evidence that the framework announced in Miller does affect their voting behavior. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
17 |
| Word count: |
6709 |
| Text sample: |
| Jurisprudential Regimes and Obscenity Doctrine Jeremy Buchman Long Island University (C.W. Post Campus) Department of Political Science 720 Northern Boulevard Brookville NY 11548 jeremy.buchman@liu.edu Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 1 - September 4 2005. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. 1 ABSTRACT This paper builds on a body of research devoted to developing the concept of “jurisprudential regimes ” which tangibly constrain Supreme Court decision making by framing |
| v. California. 1973. 413 U.S. 15. New York v. Ferber. 1982. 458 U.S. 747. Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton. 1973. 413 U.S. 49. Pope v. Illinois. 1987. 481 U.S. 497. Redrup v. New York. 1967. 386 U.S. 767. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union. 1997. 521 U.S. 844. Renton v. Playtime Theatres Inc. 1986. 475 U.S. 41. Roth v. United States. 1957. 354 U.S. 476. Sable Communications of California v. FCC. 1989. 492 U.S. 115. Schad v. Mount |
Similar Titles:
Explaining State Supreme Court Compliance with The United States Supreme Court: Causal Heterogeneity Among Legal and Political Factors
The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices: A Logit Model of Reliance on Partisanship or Precedent
|
|
