All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Understanding the Changing Dynamics of the Gender Gap in American Presidential Elections, 1952-2004
Unformatted Document Text:  Understanding the Changing Dynamics of the Gender Gap in American Presidential Elections, 1952-2004 Introduction The gender gap is an important and enduring phenomenon in American politics. According to an enormous volume of both academic and journalistic sources, the differences in the voting choices of women and men based on their partisanship and issue priorities can explain why certain candidates win and others lose. This well-known and perhaps overly used phrase has been credited as well as blamed for the outcome of several elections throughout the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Along the way many have attempted to explicate the forces that cause or at least contribute to this difference between the male and female vote, and several common findings have been suggested throughout the literature. However, few have argued that the simple gender gap is far more complex than what we are led to believe and that there are actually several “gaps” among the various types of women and men in society. To simply expect that women vote differently than men due to their gender is ignoring the various contributing factors that influence how people vote. The purpose of this study is to disaggregate the simplified gender gap and to investigate what the different factors are that generate voting choices among women in society. We investigate this by examining trends in the gender gap from 1948-2004 based upon data availability. Although it is obvious that a gap between the sexes does exist, which groups of women contribute to this gap and which groups appear to vote similarly to the men in society? This paper challenges the existence of a simple gender gap and suggests that a “cohort” gender gap is more accurate at explaining the disparity between voting decisions of certain groups of 1

Authors: O'Regan, Valerie R., Stambough, Stephen J. and Thorson, Gregory R.
first   previous   Page 2 of 38   next   last



background image
Understanding the Changing Dynamics of the
Gender Gap in American Presidential Elections,
1952-2004
Introduction
The gender gap is an important and enduring phenomenon in American politics.
According to an enormous volume of both academic and journalistic sources, the differences in
the voting choices of women and men based on their partisanship and issue priorities can explain
why certain candidates win and others lose. This well-known and perhaps overly used phrase
has been credited as well as blamed for the outcome of several elections throughout the 1980s,
1990s and 2000s. Along the way many have attempted to explicate the forces that cause or at
least contribute to this difference between the male and female vote, and several common
findings have been suggested throughout the literature. However, few have argued that the
simple gender gap is far more complex than what we are led to believe and that there are actually
several “gaps” among the various types of women and men in society. To simply expect that
women vote differently than men due to their gender is ignoring the various contributing factors
that influence how people vote.
The purpose of this study is to disaggregate the simplified gender gap and to investigate
what the different factors are that generate voting choices among women in society. We
investigate this by examining trends in the gender gap from 1948-2004 based upon data
availability. Although it is obvious that a gap between the sexes does exist, which groups of
women contribute to this gap and which groups appear to vote similarly to the men in society?
This paper challenges the existence of a simple gender gap and suggests that a “cohortgender
gap is more accurate at explaining the disparity between voting decisions of certain groups of
1


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 38   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.