 |
Taking the Pulse of Asian Political Participation in Chicago
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Taking the Pulse of Asian Political Participation in Chicago
SungYeon Choi and Helene Slessarev-Jamir
For presentation at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Sept. 1 – 4, 2005,
Washington DC.
Interest in Asian voting behavior intensified during the last two Presidential elections, as candidates and party organizations trolled for new voters among hither-to-fore untapped segments of the population. This has opened up new opportunities for Asian American communities across the nation to build political capital. During the November 2004 elections there were efforts across the country seeking to mobilize Asian American votes. This paper describes those efforts in Chicago where various ethnic organizations worked to get out the Asian American vote. Using poll monitors’ observations and exit poll results from Chinatown, as well as a second more varied group of Asians on the city’s northside and north suburbs we have sought to shed more light the particularities of Asian political opinions. We were interested in assessing the extent to which Chicago’s Asians manifest distinctive political opinion and political opinion since earlier research would suggest that Chicago’s political machine would seek to exert considerable influence over Asian voters in wards that they control.
According to the data from the Pilot National Asian American Political Survey analyzed by Lien, Collet, Wong, and Ramakrishnan, Chinese Americans’ political participation is quite low. (Lien, 2001, 627). They found that only 6 percent of Chinese voters contacted any law-maker about an issue, 7 percent had attended a political rally or public forum, and only 8 percent had donated money to a candidate. Thirty-two percent of their sample self-identifies as Democrats, an equal percentage claimed no affiliation, and 8 percent reported to be Republicans. Since the exit polling survey done in Chicago asked voters the identical questions, we have the opportunity to examine how Chicago’s Chinese American might vary from the national norm in their political opinions and voting behavior.
Chicago’s Asian American Voting Patterns
While much of the existing literature on Asian voting patterns has focused on the larger Asian communities in California there have been a few studies of Asian political participation in Chicago. Chicago’s Asian population is relatively small; only 377,739 in 2000 compared to 3,682,975 Asians living in California. Chicago’s Asian population consists of a higher percentage of new immigrants with 86% of the SMSA’s Asians being foreign born compared to 79 percent of Asians living in California. Furthermore, 44 percent of Chicago’s Asian population arrived between 1990 and 2000 while only 38 percent of California’s Asians arrived within that decade. (US Census, 2000, Summary File 4) On the other hand, among those Asians who entered the US since 1990, only 17 percent have become citizens in Chicago while 23 percent have been naturalized in California. This differential may be indicative of the greater degree of political awareness and mobilization among all Asians in California than in Chicago. However, among Chicago’s immigrants, Asians who came after 1990 had the second highest percentage of naturalized citizens, second only to Europeans. In fact, numerically, more Asians who
1
|
| | Authors: Slessarev-Jamir, Helene. |
|
| |
|
|
Taking the Pulse of Asian Political Participation in Chicago
SungYeon Choi and Helene Slessarev-Jamir
For presentation at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Sept. 1 – 4, 2005,
Washington DC.
Interest in Asian voting behavior intensified during the last two Presidential elections, as candidates and party organizations trolled for new voters among hither-to-fore untapped segments of the population. This has opened up new opportunities for Asian American communities across the nation to build political capital. During the November 2004 elections there were efforts across the country seeking to mobilize Asian American votes. This paper describes those efforts in Chicago where various ethnic organizations worked to get out the Asian American vote. Using poll monitors’ observations and exit poll results from Chinatown, as well as a second more varied group of Asians on the city’s northside and north suburbs we have sought to shed more light the particularities of Asian political opinions. We were interested in assessing the extent to which Chicago’s Asians manifest distinctive political opinion and political opinion since earlier research would suggest that Chicago’s political machine would seek to exert considerable influence over Asian voters in wards that they control.
According to the data from the Pilot National Asian American Political Survey analyzed by Lien, Collet, Wong, and Ramakrishnan, Chinese Americans’ political participation is quite low. (Lien, 2001, 627). They found that only 6 percent of Chinese voters contacted any law-maker about an issue, 7 percent had attended a political rally or public forum, and only 8 percent had donated money to a candidate. Thirty-two percent of their sample self-identifies as Democrats, an equal percentage claimed no affiliation, and 8 percent reported to be Republicans. Since the exit polling survey done in Chicago asked voters the identical questions, we have the opportunity to examine how Chicago’s Chinese American might vary from the national norm in their political opinions and voting behavior.
Chicago’s Asian American Voting Patterns
While much of the existing literature on Asian voting patterns has focused on the larger Asian communities in California there have been a few studies of Asian political participation in Chicago. Chicago’s Asian population is relatively small; only 377,739 in 2000 compared to 3,682,975 Asians living in California. Chicago’s Asian population consists of a higher percentage of new immigrants with 86% of the SMSA’s Asians being foreign born compared to 79 percent of Asians living in California. Furthermore, 44 percent of Chicago’s Asian population arrived between 1990 and 2000 while only 38 percent of California’s Asians arrived within that decade. (US Census, 2000, Summary File 4) On the other hand, among those Asians who entered the US since 1990, only 17 percent have become citizens in Chicago while 23 percent have been naturalized in California. This differential may be indicative of the greater degree of political awareness and mobilization among all Asians in California than in Chicago. However, among Chicago’s immigrants, Asians who came after 1990 had the second highest percentage of naturalized citizens, second only to Europeans. In fact, numerically, more Asians who
1
|
|
Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|