All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

21st Century Americanism: What it is and where it comes from
Unformatted Document Text:  Two main features of the 21 st Century Americanism survey improve upon existing attempts to assess how Americans define the content of American identity. The first involves the way in which the series of questions is introduced. The second involves the range of items included in the questionnaire. Existing survey items designed to capture how Americans define the content of American identity, such as the ones used in the 1996 GSS, generally use the following format: “Some people say the following things are important for being truly American. Others say they are not important. How important do you think each of the following is?” Then they proceed to ask about a handful of ideas that tap into America’s liberal and ethnocultural traditions. This wording makes it difficult, if not impossible, to know if respondents are saying what they normatively believe to be important characteristics for Americans to have or if they are simply acknowledging that particular characteristics have generally been influential in defining someone as American. For example, I might say that being a Christian is very important in making someone a true American because I recognize that non-Christians have often felt excluded from the American mainstream. I may deplore this reality, but I may still agree that Christianity has played a central role in defining American identity. The present survey addresses this conflation of acknowledgment and normative approval by asking respondents: “I’m going to read a list of things that some people say are important in making someone a true American. The first one is ________. Would you say that it should be very important, somewhat important, somewhat unimportant, or very unimportant in making someone a true American?” This change allows for a greater likelihood that respondents’ answers will reflect their own American ideal. The emphasis, in other words, is more explicitly on the aspects of American identity that respondents prize, for it is this emphasis that will enable us to determine what people have in mind when they say that being American is important to them and makes them proud. The items that follow the battery introduction consist of both items that have been asked in previous surveys and items that I believe needed to be added in order to develop a more accurate operationalization of the content of American identity. Below, I describe each item according to the broader conception it was intended to measure (a match that is tested empirically in later sections). Table 1 lists each item, the tradition it was intended to measure, the percentage of respondents that says the item is either very or somewhat important, and the standard deviations. 5 [Table 1 About Here] Ethnoculturalism: The first two items (being born in America and being a Christian) come directly from the tried-and-true GSS battery of American identity items while the last two items (having European ancestors and being white) are new and more directly capture ethnoculturalism’s exclusivity. Perhaps not surprisingly, those last two items garner the least amount of support. Endorsement of ethnoculturalism overall, however, is still at a non-trivial level. Thirty-five percent of respondents say Americans should be Christians, 17% say Americans should have European ancestors, and 10% say Americans should be white. At some 5 Percentages are weighted with the population weights provided by the SESRC. To minimize respondent fatigue, the American identity series was randomly divided into two halves. The first half was asked early in the survey; the second half was asked later. The items within each half were rotated randomly. 8

Authors: Schildkraut, Deborah.
first   previous   Page 9 of 28   next   last



background image
Two main features of the 21
st
Century Americanism survey improve upon existing
attempts to assess how Americans define the content of American identity. The first involves the
way in which the series of questions is introduced. The second involves the range of items
included in the questionnaire.
Existing survey items designed to capture how Americans define the content of American
identity, such as the ones used in the 1996 GSS, generally use the following format: “Some
people say the following things are important for being truly American. Others say they are not
important. How important do you think each of the following is?” Then they proceed to ask
about a handful of ideas that tap into America’s liberal and ethnocultural traditions. This wording
makes it difficult, if not impossible, to know if respondents are saying what they normatively
believe to be important characteristics for Americans to have or if they are simply
acknowledging that particular characteristics have generally been influential in defining someone
as American. For example, I might say that being a Christian is very important in making
someone a true American because I recognize that non-Christians have often felt excluded from
the American mainstream. I may deplore this reality, but I may still agree that Christianity has
played a central role in defining American identity. The present survey addresses this conflation
of acknowledgment and normative approval by asking respondents: “I’m going to read a list of
things that some people say are important in making someone a true American. The first one is
________. Would you say that it should be very important, somewhat important, somewhat
unimportant, or very unimportant in making someone a true American?” This change allows for
a greater likelihood that respondents’ answers will reflect their own American ideal. The
emphasis, in other words, is more explicitly on the aspects of American identity that respondents
prize, for it is this emphasis that will enable us to determine what people have in mind when they
say that being American is important to them and makes them proud.
The items that follow the battery introduction consist of both items that have been asked
in previous surveys and items that I believe needed to be added in order to develop a more
accurate operationalization of the content of American identity. Below, I describe each item
according to the broader conception it was intended to measure (a match that is tested
empirically in later sections). Table 1 lists each item, the tradition it was intended to measure, the
percentage of respondents that says the item is either very or somewhat important, and the
standard deviations.
[Table 1 About Here]
Ethnoculturalism: The first two items (being born in America and being a Christian)
come directly from the tried-and-true GSS battery of American identity items while the last two
items (having European ancestors and being white) are new and more directly capture
ethnoculturalism’s exclusivity. Perhaps not surprisingly, those last two items garner the least
amount of support. Endorsement of ethnoculturalism overall, however, is still at a non-trivial
level. Thirty-five percent of respondents say Americans should be Christians, 17% say
Americans should have European ancestors, and 10% say Americans should be white. At some
5
Percentages are weighted with the population weights provided by the SESRC. To minimize respondent fatigue,
the American identity series was randomly divided into two halves. The first half was asked early in the survey; the
second half was asked later. The items within each half were rotated randomly.
8


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.