All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Racial Stigmatization and its Impact on Public Policy Delivery among African-Americans
Unformatted Document Text:  Also of interest to note, in Table A-2 when estimating the Baseline model for the white sub-sample, living in the Southern region and possessing a liberal ideology are not significant predictors as they were in the model entire sample. As hypothesized, the fully specified model in column 3 indicates not only that an individual’s characteristics matter, but that the community they reside in continues to matter and shape trust levels. Individuals residing in communities with a larger percentage of African Americans are less likely to trust African Americans, regardless of individual demographic factors. Trusting Whites The level of trust that individuals posses for African Americans is important, however we are concerned with the trust levels that African Americans possess towards whites. As we hypothesize, does racial discrimination coupled with racial stigmatization impact African Americans ability to trust whites? Does the level of trust vary if the individuals are residing in the South where race relations have historically been the most strained? Are Blacks living in areas with a large population more or less likely to trust whites? In this section we repeat the ordered logistic and the HLM models, with a dependent variable measuring the level respondents trust whites. We measure the level of trust of whites with the following survey question: ““How much do you trust white people?” with responses ranging from 4 (trust them a lot) to 1 (trust them not at all). Alesina and La Ferraa (2000) find that racial fragmentation and racial inequality are positively correlated and that racial fragmentation leads to a 12 percent decrease in trust levels between blacks and whites. Racial fragmentation as a whole decreases the probability of trusting others by three percentage points in their study, almost 10 percent of the mean value. This is larger than the effect of having a traumatic experience in the last year, and almost the same size as the effect as being divorced or 19

Authors: Gilbert, Michele. and Matthews, Ronald.
first   previous   Page 19 of 37   next   last



background image
Also of interest to note, in Table A-2 when estimating the Baseline model for the white
sub-sample, living in the Southern region and possessing a liberal ideology are not significant
predictors as they were in the model entire sample.
As hypothesized, the fully specified model in column 3 indicates not only that an
individual’s characteristics matter, but that the community they reside in continues to matter and
shape trust levels. Individuals residing in communities with a larger percentage of African
Americans are less likely to trust African Americans, regardless of individual demographic
factors.
Trusting Whites
The level of trust that individuals posses for African Americans is important, however we
are concerned with the trust levels that African Americans possess towards whites. As we
hypothesize, does racial discrimination coupled with racial stigmatization impact African
Americans ability to trust whites? Does the level of trust vary if the individuals are residing in
the South where race relations have historically been the most strained? Are Blacks living in
areas with a large population more or less likely to trust whites?
In this section we repeat the ordered logistic and the HLM models, with a dependent
variable measuring the level respondents trust whites. We measure the level of trust of whites
with the following survey question: ““How much do you trust white people?” with responses
ranging from 4 (trust them a lot) to 1 (trust them not at all).
Alesina and La Ferraa (2000) find
that racial fragmentation and racial inequality are positively correlated and that racial
fragmentation leads to a 12 percent decrease in trust levels between blacks and whites. Racial
fragmentation as a whole decreases the probability of trusting others by three percentage points
in their study, almost 10 percent of the mean value. This is larger than the effect of having a
traumatic experience in the last year, and almost the same size as the effect as being divorced or
19


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.