(Page 37 of 37) - Racial Stigmatization and its Impact on Public Policy Delivery among African-Americans authored by Gilbert, Michele. and Matthews, Ronald.

Info/Citation	FAQ Research All Academic Inc.
Document

Racial Stigmatization and its Impact on Public Policy Delivery among African-Americans

Unformatted Document Text: Appendix Table A-6: TRUST LOCAL GOVERNMENT With Community Variables, Full Sample With Community Variables, African American Sample Model Specification HLM HLM Individual VariablesAfrican American -.038 (.016) .017 -- -- Latino .213 (.021) .000 -- -- Asian American .201 (.045) .000 -- -- Income -.019 (.012) .117 .014 (.031) .638 Education .071 (.007) .000 .038 (.020) .056 Age .002 (.001) .000 .003 (.001) .000 Female .021 (.011) .046 .023 (.029) .424 Conservative -.029 (.012) .017 .155 (.035) .000 Liberal .032 (.014) .019 .070 (.036) .054 South -.016 (.014) .235 .068 (.033) .043 Political Activism .074 (.015) .000 .105 (.042) .011 Community VariablesIncome -.004 (.025) .864 -.044 (.068) .513 Educational Attainment .092 (.026) .000 .101 (.087) .244 African American Population -.162 (.074) .029 -.235 (.114) .027 Latino Population .057 (.096) .553 .020 (.270) .941 Asian American Population -.312 (.151) .039 -.405 (.482) .925 Pseudo R2 .030 .155 N 19,534 2,702 Note: Unstandardized ordered logistic and hierarchical linear regression coefficients with robust standard errors in parentheses. Probabilities based on two-tailed tests. Source: The national random sample telephone survey was conducted by the Civic Engagement in America Project at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. The survey was conducted by telephone using random-digit-dialing during July - November, 2000 except for the West Oakland, California survey (which ran from December, 2000 - February, 2001). Respondents were asked, “How much of the time can you trust the local government to do what is right?” Responses coded 4 = just about always; 3 = most of the time; 2 = some of the time; 4 = hardly ever. 37

Authors: Gilbert, Michele. and Matthews, Ronald.

first

previous

Page 37 of 37 next

next

last

background image

Appendix Table A-6: TRUST LOCAL GOVERNMENT

With Community

Variables,

Full Sample

With Community

Variables,

African American Sample

Model Specification

HLM

HLM

Individual Variables
African American

-.038 (.016)

.017

--

--

Latino

.213 (.021)

.000

--

--

Asian American

.201 (.045)

.000

--

--

Income

-.019 (.012)

.117

.014 (.031)

.638

Education

.071 (.007)

.000

.038 (.020)

.056

Age

.002 (.001)

.000

.003 (.001)

.000

Female

.021 (.011)

.046

.023 (.029)

.424

Conservative

-.029 (.012)

.017

.155 (.035)

.000

Liberal

.032 (.014)

.019

.070 (.036)

.054

South

-.016 (.014)

.235

.068 (.033)

.043

Political Activism

.074 (.015)

.000

.105 (.042)

.011

Community Variables
Income

-.004 (.025)

.864

-.044 (.068)

.513

Educational Attainment

.092 (.026)

.000

.101 (.087)

.244

African American Population -.162 (.074)

.029

-.235 (.114)

.027

Latino Population

.057 (.096)

.553

.020 (.270)

.941

Asian American Population

-.312 (.151)

.039

-.405 (.482)

.925

Pseudo R2

.030

.155

N

19,534

2,702

Note: Unstandardized ordered logistic and hierarchical linear regression coefficients with robust standard errors in

parentheses. Probabilities based on two-tailed tests. Source: The national random sample telephone survey was conducted by

the Civic Engagement in America Project at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. The survey was conducted by

telephone using random-digit-dialing during July - November, 2000 except for the West Oakland, California survey (which

ran from December, 2000 - February, 2001). Respondents were asked, “How much of the time can you trust the local

government to do what is right?” Responses coded 4 = just about always; 3 = most of the time; 2 = some of the time; 4 =

hardly ever.

37

Convention

All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.

Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.

Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!

Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!

Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.

Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!

Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!

Click here for more information.

first

previous

Page 37 of 37 next

next

last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.