Author's Keywords: Latino politics, Public Opinion, Kaiser, socioeconomics, gender, women	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41326_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Perez Monforti, Jessica., Garcia Bedolla, Lisa. and Pantoja, Adrian. "Latino Gender Differences in Public Opinion: Results from the 1999 Kaiser Survey" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41326_index.html>

Perez Monforti, J. L., Garcia Bedolla, L. and Pantoja, A. D. , 2005-09-01 "Latino Gender Differences in Public Opinion: Results from the 1999 Kaiser Survey" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41326_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: These findings raise the theoretical question of how scholars see group memberships, like race and gender, operating in U.S. politics. Is it, as the socioeconomic status (SES) model contends, simply that race and gender act as a proxy for socioeconomic indicators, and that those factors are in fact what are driving opinion patterns? Or, do we believe that race, gender, and experiences of marginalization as sociological phenomena, affect how particular groups of people see and interpret the political world in a way that is fundamentally different than, for example, age, union membership, or ideology? The sociological approach is similar to Sapiro and Conover�s (1997) distinction between �positional� and �structural� approaches to the study of gender and political behavior. They argue that the positional view assumes that women and men�s political beliefs, values, or issue positions differ, leading them to make different electoral choices. The structural explanation posits gender will gain political significance through the structure of relationships among political attitudes, values, and judgments. In other words, even if men and women hold exactly the same policy positions, the value and weight they place on each issue, because of their life experiences, will vary, making it possible for men and women to vote similarly, but for very different reasons (Sapiro and Conover 1997: 498)

Doing Gender in the Interview: Gender Differences in "Don't Know" Responses to Political Attitude Questions

Partisan or Gendered? The Gender Gap and Public Opinion among African American Men