Citation

Quick, Bar the Gates!: Ohio's Issue 1 (Same-Sex Marriage Ban) and Religious Communities

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

In the 2004 elections, same-sex marriage bans swept through the states with ease, passing in Ohio (as Issue 1) with over three-fifths support. We surveyed clergy around Columbus conducted just after the election, having clergy serve as organizational informants. That is, the survey instrument included a significant battery tapping the participation of clergy in ministerial organizations (MOs), the extent to which these extra-congregational organizations were engaged with Issue 1, and the internal dynamics of MOs.
Employing a blend of clergy political behavior, interest group, and social movement theories, we suspect that most MOs are limited in their ability to respond to the Issue 1 conflict. The internal diversity of MOs as well as the divisive nature of the issue constrain them. At the same time, MOs exist in some tension with the community in their ministries, which may include calling some to account and engaging a prophetic role. While clergy challenge, they are also representatives of their faith and congregations, a finding gaining support for other clergy politics inquiries.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

clergi (141), issu (128), 1 (123), group (98), mos (96), polit (87), mo (87), communiti (79), member (63), organ (63), activ (61), action (57), interest (56), congreg (48), public (44), involv (44), ohio (42), barrier (41), take (41), religi (39), church (38),

Author's Keywords:

gay rights, clergy, religion and politics, Ohio
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41336_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Djupe, Paul., Neiheisel, Jake., Sokhey, Anand. and Niles, Franklyn. "Quick, Bar the Gates!: Ohio's Issue 1 (Same-Sex Marriage Ban) and Religious Communities" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41336_index.html>

APA Citation:

Djupe, P. A., Neiheisel, J. , Sokhey, A. and Niles, F. , 2005-09-01 "Quick, Bar the Gates!: Ohio's Issue 1 (Same-Sex Marriage Ban) and Religious Communities" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41336_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In the 2004 elections, same-sex marriage bans swept through the states with ease, passing in Ohio (as Issue 1) with over three-fifths support. We surveyed clergy around Columbus conducted just after the election, having clergy serve as organizational informants. That is, the survey instrument included a significant battery tapping the participation of clergy in ministerial organizations (MOs), the extent to which these extra-congregational organizations were engaged with Issue 1, and the internal dynamics of MOs.
Employing a blend of clergy political behavior, interest group, and social movement theories, we suspect that most MOs are limited in their ability to respond to the Issue 1 conflict. The internal diversity of MOs as well as the divisive nature of the issue constrain them. At the same time, MOs exist in some tension with the community in their ministries, which may include calling some to account and engaging a prophetic role. While clergy challenge, they are also representatives of their faith and congregations, a finding gaining support for other clergy politics inquiries.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 39
Word count: 11585
Text sample:
Quick Bar The Gates! Representing the Religious Community’s Voice in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in Ohio’s Issue 1 Jacob R. Neiheisel Denison University Paul A. Djupe Denison University Anand E. Sokhey The Ohio State University Franklyn C. Niles John Brown University A BSTRACT In the 2004 elections same-sex marriage bans swept through the states with ease passing in Ohio (as Issue 1) with over three-fifths support. We surveyed clergy around Columbus conducted just after the election having clergy serve
interest in Issue 1 -.195 (.151) Frequency with which clergy addressed Issue 1 .421 (.134) *** Mainline Protestant -.023 (.387) Evangelical Protestant .173 (.388) Constant .220 (1.127) Number of cases 55 Adjusted R² .448 S.E.E. .885 F test 4.997 *** Source: 2004 Columbus Clergy Issue 1 Study. *** p<0.01 ** p<0.05 * p<0.10. 38


Similar Titles:
The Organized Representation of American Religious Groups: Religious Mobilization or Interest Group Politics?

Religious Social Networks and Political Interest: The Impact of Church Attendance vs. Perceptions of Church Membership


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.