All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Economic Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness: A Vicious Circle?
Unformatted Document Text:  1 "…a key characteristic of democracy is the continuing responsiveness of the government to the preferences of its citizens, considered as political equals." Robert Dahl, Polyarchy, p.1 The ability of citizens to influence public policy is the "bottom line" of democratic government. While few would expect or even desire a perfect correspondence between majority preference and government policy, the nature of the connection between what citizens want and what government does is a central consideration in evaluating the quality of democratic governance. Without elections, policy makers would have little incentive to consider the preferences of the governed. But do elections help ensure that the "voice of the people" is heard in the halls of government? Or do elections empower only a privileged subset of citizens who possess the financial and other resources to influence the political process? Considerable prior research has examined the relationship between government policy and the preferences of the public taken as a whole. The project I report on here asks whose preferences are most influential in shaping policy decisions. While democracy requires that government policy reflect the preferences of the governed--at least in broad outlines over the long run--true democracy also requires that all citizens, not just the powerful or well-off, have an influence over government policies. In the pages that follow, I report findings from a project that seeks to understand inequalities in government responsiveness to the preferences of the governed. To assess citizen influence over government policy, I combine survey measures of an extensive array of public preferences collected over the past two decades with evaluations of actual government policymaking. The broader project will examine changes over time in the relationship between

Authors: Gilens, Martin.
first   previous   Page 2 of 25   next   last



background image
1
"…a key characteristic of democracy is the continuing responsiveness of the government to the
preferences of its citizens, considered as political equals."

Robert
Dahl,
Polyarchy,
p.1
The ability of citizens to influence public policy is the "bottom line" of democratic
government. While few would expect or even desire a perfect correspondence between majority
preference and government policy, the nature of the connection between what citizens want and
what government does is a central consideration in evaluating the quality of democratic
governance.
Without elections, policy makers would have little incentive to consider the preferences
of the governed. But do elections help ensure that the "voice of the people" is heard in the halls
of government? Or do elections empower only a privileged subset of citizens who possess the
financial and other resources to influence the political process?
Considerable prior research has examined the relationship between government policy
and the preferences of the public taken as a whole. The project I report on here asks whose
preferences are most influential in shaping policy decisions. While democracy requires that
government policy reflect the preferences of the governed--at least in broad outlines over the
long run--true democracy also requires that all citizens, not just the powerful or well-off, have an
influence over government policies.
In the pages that follow, I report findings from a project that seeks to understand
inequalities in government responsiveness to the preferences of the governed. To assess citizen
influence over government policy, I combine survey measures of an extensive array of public
preferences collected over the past two decades with evaluations of actual government
policymaking. The broader project will examine changes over time in the relationship between


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 25   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.