Author's Keywords: racial and ethnic politics, interest groups, inter-racial coalitions, supreme court, congress	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41423_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Hero, Rodney. and Preuhs, Robert. "National Black and Latino Advocacy Groups: Re-Examining the Promise of Cooperation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41423_index.html>

Hero, R. and Preuhs, R. R. , 2005-09-01 "National Black and Latino Advocacy Groups: Re-Examining the Promise of Cooperation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41423_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: What might the changes toward an increasingly “multi-ethnic society” mean for political relationships between minority/civil rights groups, and for the future of American politics and its ostensible political pluralism more broadly? What are the likely bases for cooperation and conflict between minority groups? What “do they want,” i.e., what are their policy concerns and preferred policy outcomes? Despite much popular discussion and considerable speculation about multi-ethnic, multi-racial politics and the asserted need to “move beyond a ‘black/white’ paradigm” rather few research efforts have considered this set of issues directly (for one such effort, however, see Clarke, Hero and Sidney, 2005; also see McClain, 1993 ; McClain and Karnig, 1990; Meier and Stewart, 1991; Browning, Marshall, and Tabb, 1984; Kim 1999). How, then, might we begin to sort out and make sense of these theoretical and substantive questions? The present research begins to systematically examine several facets of one major dimension of inter-group political relationships, focusing on minority advocacy or “interest” groups, to consider the common-ground and/or differences between several of these groups. Its focus is on minority inter-group relations and policy at the national (federal) level, an important extension in that most work has centered on urban politics.

Advocacy at the Intersections: Women's, Racial Minority, and Economic Justice Interest Groups and Intersectional Policy Issues

When Does Interest Group Policy Information Matter? A Dynamic Study of New Technology Interest Groups? Use of Information in Congressional Hearings