All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

National Parties and "The Footrule of Local Prejudice": The Transformation of Intra-party Relationships in the Late Nineteenth Century
Unformatted Document Text:  Within the subfield of American Political Development, the localized structure of the party organizations has been commented on by—and in some cases assumed by—most students of nineteenth century American state development. John Aldrich’s work presents the emergent party structure as the solution to a collective action problem presented by uniting diverse existing state organizations behind a national electoral strategy. In order to attain the maximum benefits of collective action and to minimize the cost to individuals of participating, the Jacksonian founders had “to knit together those already in place in local politics, the national party had to yield them autonomy. Each local unit needed the freedom to establish its own definition of benefits in the collective good.” 6 Strategic imperatives alone do not provide legitimacy of the sort that the major political parties enjoyed in the late nineteenth century; long usage gave the procedural practices of the parties legitimacy, and as they helped the parties control the nascent American state, the norms of the Jacksonian mode infiltrated state procedures as well. Hence, Amy Bridges conclusion that “it was in the antebellum years that city politics came to have an independent existence, turning on its own issues rather than on national events,” 7 should be read in the context of the specific Jacksonian party structure that overlay national politics during that time; a significant reason that local (especially urban) party organizations pursued goals so different from those at the national level was that the Jacksonian party organizations allowed them to do so. Also, the localist structure reinforced patronage practices and the system of presidential deference to congressmen, the practice of geographical representation in the cabinet, and partly accounts for the supremacy of Congress over the presidency as the locus of party power. The policy implications of this structural design play a prominent role in the analysis of 6 John Aldrich, Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), 10-15. 7 Amy Bridges, A City in the Republic: Antebellum New York and the Origins of Machine Politics, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984), 1. 5

Authors: Klinghard, Daniel.
first   previous   Page 5 of 57   next   last



background image
Within the subfield of American Political Development, the localized structure of the
party organizations has been commented on by—and in some cases assumed by—most students
of nineteenth century American state development. John Aldrich’s work presents the emergent
party structure as the solution to a collective action problem presented by uniting diverse existing
state organizations behind a national electoral strategy. In order to attain the maximum benefits
of collective action and to minimize the cost to individuals of participating, the Jacksonian
founders had “to knit together those already in place in local politics, the national party had to
yield them autonomy. Each local unit needed the freedom to establish its own definition of
benefits in the collective good.”
Strategic imperatives alone do not provide legitimacy of the
sort that the major political parties enjoyed in the late nineteenth century; long usage gave the
procedural practices of the parties legitimacy, and as they helped the parties control the nascent
American state, the norms of the Jacksonian mode infiltrated state procedures as well.
Hence, Amy Bridges conclusion that “it was in the antebellum years that city politics
came to have an independent existence, turning on its own issues rather than on national
events,”
should be read in the context of the specific Jacksonian party structure that overlay
national politics during that time; a significant reason that local (especially urban) party
organizations pursued goals so different from those at the national level was that the Jacksonian
party organizations allowed them to do so. Also, the localist structure reinforced patronage
practices and the system of presidential deference to congressmen, the practice of geographical
representation in the cabinet, and partly accounts for the supremacy of Congress over the
presidency as the locus of party power.
The policy implications of this structural design play a prominent role in the analysis of
6
John Aldrich, Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America, (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1995), 10-15.
7
Amy Bridges, A City in the Republic: Antebellum New York and the Origins of Machine Politics, (Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 1984), 1.
5


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 5 of 57   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.