All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

National Parties and "The Footrule of Local Prejudice": The Transformation of Intra-party Relationships in the Late Nineteenth Century
Unformatted Document Text:  lines. . . each a jumble of incongruous elements, and neither daring to speak out wisely and fearlessly what should be said on the vital issues of the day,” and insisted that Republican leaders did not “represent the rank and file of the Republican voters.” 188 Further, it is difficult to imagine the Democratic party of the New Deal Era competing as late nineteenth century parties had; the parochial base of support for Franklin Roosevelt’s policies was simply much weaker than its support among interests and within the broader public, and while Roosevelt played parochial politics as well as any nineteenth century politician, his mastery of a national politics of education is usually the lynchpin of scholars’ assessment of his party leadership. In reshaping the content of national campaigns, centering control of party organizations at the national level, and reorienting the basis of party affiliation, national party leaders in the late nineteenth century anticipated the recommendations of the American Political Science Association’s Committee on Parties by more than a generation. Substantive campaigns, national organizations, and interest-based affiliation are the electoral hallmarks of what political scientists call “responsible” mass parties. While this argument does not seek to prove consistently that the Committee’s idea of party was shaped by the late nineteenth century idea of party, it does suggest that an organic idea of mass party organizations existed outside the realm of academic speculation long before calls for a “responsible” party organization shaped the way that political scientists assess parties in America. The parties thus deserve to be reinstated in a primary place in the history of the development of the national state, and “party decline” should be re-evaluated as “party change.” 188 Theodore Roosevelt, “Speech Before the National Convention of the Progressive Party,” August 6, 1912, in John Gabriel Hunt, ed., The Essential Theodore Roosevelt, (New York: Gramercy Books, 1994), 282, 285. 57

Authors: Klinghard, Daniel.
first   previous   Page 57 of 57   next   last



background image
lines. . . each a jumble of incongruous elements, and neither daring to speak out wisely and
fearlessly what should be said on the vital issues of the day,” and insisted that Republican leaders
did not “represent the rank and file of the Republican voters.”
Further, it is difficult to imagine
the Democratic party of the New Deal Era competing as late nineteenth century parties had; the
parochial base of support for Franklin Roosevelt’s policies was simply much weaker than its
support among interests and within the broader public, and while Roosevelt played parochial
politics as well as any nineteenth century politician, his mastery of a national politics of
education is usually the lynchpin of scholars’ assessment of his party leadership.
In reshaping the content of national campaigns, centering control of party organizations
at the national level, and reorienting the basis of party affiliation, national party leaders in the
late nineteenth century anticipated the recommendations of the American Political Science
Association’s Committee on Parties by more than a generation. Substantive campaigns, national
organizations, and interest-based affiliation are the electoral hallmarks of what political scientists
call “responsible” mass parties. While this argument does not seek to prove consistently that the
Committee’s idea of party was shaped by the late nineteenth century idea of party, it does
suggest that an organic idea of mass party organizations existed outside the realm of academic
speculation long before calls for a “responsible” party organization shaped the way that political
scientists assess parties in America. The parties thus deserve to be reinstated in a primary place
in the history of the development of the national state, and “party decline” should be re-evaluated
as “party change.”
188
Theodore Roosevelt, “Speech Before the National Convention of the Progressive Party,” August 6, 1912, in John
Gabriel Hunt, ed., The Essential Theodore Roosevelt, (New York: Gramercy Books, 1994), 282, 285.
57


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 57 of 57   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.