Author's Keywords: presidential elections, political campaigns, battleground states, political competition, marginal voters, voting	Convention Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41505_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Kaufmann, Karen. and Gimpel, James. "Battleground States versus Blackout States: The Behavioral Implications of Modern Presidential Campaigns" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41505_index.html>

Kaufmann, K. M. and Gimpel, J. G. , 2005-09-01 "Battleground States versus Blackout States: The Behavioral Implications of Modern Presidential Campaigns" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41505_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: We examine the impact of �battleground� designation by presidential campaign strategists on the political activation and involvement of resource poor and peripheral voters, including those in lower income brackets, weak partisans, and African Americans. Increased exposure to campaign stimuli may provide voters in the contested states with an appreciable advantage over those in the �blackout� states by underwriting the cost associated with becoming informed and engaged. Our findings show that the condition of living on contested electoral terrain does have a positive impact on the interest and engagement levels of lower income voters. These effects are likely to accumulate and multiply if battleground and non-battleground designations remain fixed over longer periods of time. To the extent that the participatory benefits of battleground status are lost on those living it the �blackout� states, the gains in socioeconomic diversity among battleground voters may be offset by shrinking, less diverse electorates elsewhere.

Labor Unions and American Elections: The Politics of Voter Mobilization in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections

Political Participation in Battleground and Non-Battleground States During US Presidential Elections, 1988-2004

State-Level Barriers to Participation: Voter Interest, Electoral Competitiveness and Participation