Author's Keywords: elections, partisan, electorate, values	Convention Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41510_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Gunther, Richard., Beck, Paul., Kuan, H.C.. and Smidt, Corwin. "Value Cleavages and Partisan Conflict: The 2004 American Presidential Election in Comparative Perspective" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41510_index.html>

Gunther, R. , Beck, P. A., Kuan, H. and Smidt, C. , 2005-09-01 "Value Cleavages and Partisan Conflict: The 2004 American Presidential Election in Comparative Perspective" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41510_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper is a preliminary attempt to map the attitudinal underpinnings of partisan preference in seven countries on the basis of a multidimensional and cross-nationally comparable battery of questions dealing with sociopolitical values that have commonly had considerable relevance to partisan politics. These items (which fall between the high level of abstraction of the personality attributes often used by political psychologists in their studies of values, at one extreme, and the specificity of the highly transient and idiographic "issues" that figure so prominently in most election studies, at the other) were deduced from attitudinal domains inherent within major political ideologies that emerged over the past three centuries and have had considerable impact on party development, electoral behavior and, more generally, political conflict in many countries, particularly in Western Europe. As we will demonstrate, these values have exerted a profound impact on electoral behavior in several countries even after the effects of other determinants of the vote have been "controlled" in previous stages of a stepwise multivariate analysis. Indeed, in three of the four countries within which coherent values clusters emerged from previous stages of analysis, the explanatory power of these values is substantially greater than that of all social-cleavage variables combined.

Electoral Politics and Vote Cleavages in a New Democracy: Split Ticket Voting in Nicaragua's 2006 Presidential Election

An Analysis of the Determinants of State Reproductive Health Care Policies: Ideology, Party Competition, and Political Culture

Cleavage Politics and Party Support in Parliamentary Democracies: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis