Author's Keywords: Bush, campaign, rhetoric, language, DICTION	Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41598_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Hart, Roderick. "George W. Bush and the Language of Command: A Daily Diary" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41598_index.html>

Hart, R. P. , 2005-09-01 "George W. Bush and the Language of Command: A Daily Diary" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41598_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This essay examines George W. Bush’s campaign rhetoric in both 2000 and 2004 and compares his style to that of his predecessors. Using a computerized language analysis program called DICTION, the study finds that Bush was quite tentative during the 2000 campaign and eschewed use of a narrative style. By the time his reelection campaign began, however, Bush had dramatically increased his hortatory and narrative scores, meaning he had found both an important story to tell and a forceful way of telling it. Because these qualities increased steadily over time, and because they seem to have been initiated by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, they signal important epistemological, sociological, psychological, and political aspects of the Bush presidency and, perhaps, of the national electorate itself.

Labor Unions and American Elections: The Politics of Voter Mobilization in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections

Green Politics and the Modern American Presidency - FDR to George W. Bush

Charley, Frances, Ivan, Jeanne, and George W. :Impact of Hurricanes on 2004 National Election: The Campaign Effect?