All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Culture of Crisis: Information, Public Opinion and the Scope of American Civil Liberties in the Era of Terrorist Threat
Unformatted Document Text:  The functioning of American democracy requires that citizens of highly disparate perspectives be equal in their rights. For this reason, Americans ideally practice political tolerance -- or the willingness to allow the exercise of such rights as freedom of speech, association, and demonstration -- even when confronted with individuals or groups espousing ideas that are upsetting or repellant to their own views. Despite high levels of citizen support for political tolerance in the abstract, however, previous scholars have found Americans to be much less supportive of extensions of rights as applied to specific groups and situations. In the 1995 book, With Malice Toward Some, 1 one group of scholars innovated with respect to the study of political tolerance through an emphasis on the effect of information on citizen support for political tolerance. Previous literature had focused instead upon long-term individual predispositions in order to explain tolerant decisions. This project extends the study of the interaction between information and citizen willingness to allow unpopular groups to exercise certain fundamental American rights. Indeed, following September 11, 2001, the American public has been subjected to an almost continuous stream of threatening information with respect to terrorism. This project investigates the effect of such exposure upon Americans' support for civil liberties in a quantitative and experimental manner. In addition, this project extends prior tolerance research through a focus upon often neglected categories of civil liberties, such as protections against unlawful search and seizure and against self-incrimination. It is with respect to procedural rights like these that the greatest possible erosion in citizen support for democratic principles exists, as support for the extension of these rights to members of unpopular groups is often lower even absent national crisis. 1 Marcus, George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and Sandra L. Wood. 1995. With Malice Toward Some. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2

Authors: Merola, Linda.
first   previous   Page 2 of 31   next   last



background image
The functioning of American democracy requires that citizens of highly disparate
perspectives be equal in their rights. For this reason, Americans ideally practice political
tolerance -- or the willingness to allow the exercise of such rights as freedom of speech,
association, and demonstration -- even when confronted with individuals or groups
espousing ideas that are upsetting or repellant to their own views. Despite high levels of
citizen support for political tolerance in the abstract, however, previous scholars have
found Americans to be much less supportive of extensions of rights as applied to specific
groups and situations. In the 1995 book, With Malice Toward Some,
one group of
scholars innovated with respect to the study of political tolerance through an emphasis on
the effect of information on citizen support for political tolerance. Previous literature had
focused instead upon long-term individual predispositions in order to explain tolerant
decisions.
This project extends the study of the interaction between information and citizen
willingness to allow unpopular groups to exercise certain fundamental American rights.
Indeed, following September 11, 2001, the American public has been subjected to an
almost continuous stream of threatening information with respect to terrorism. This
project investigates the effect of such exposure upon Americans' support for civil liberties
in a quantitative and experimental manner. In addition, this project extends prior tolerance
research through a focus upon often neglected categories of civil liberties, such as
protections against unlawful search and seizure and against self-incrimination. It is with
respect to procedural rights like these that the greatest possible erosion in citizen support
for democratic principles exists, as support for the extension of these rights to members of
unpopular groups is often lower even absent national crisis.
1
Marcus, George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and Sandra L. Wood. 1995. With Malice
Toward Some. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 31   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.