|
|
|
|
Understanding Grassroots Stakeholders and Grassroots Stakeholder Groups: The View from the Grassroots in the Upper Sugar Creek |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Although collaborative watershed management is increasingly accepted as the dominant paradigm in resource management and environmental policy, research on collaborative watershed organizations has largely ignored the attitudes and behaviors of grassroots stakeholders and the formation and organization of grassroots watershed groups. Instead, the research on collaborative watershed management has remained focused on the study of policy elites or “grasstops” (Graetz and Shapiro 2005) stakeholders, including “interest group leaders, elected officials, bureaucrats, and partnership staff” (Lubell 2004, 341) and on watershed partnerships, defined as a “collection of parties, usually featuring both private and governmental representatives…” (Kenny et al. 2000, quoted in Lubell, et al 2002), i.e. as collaborations among such policy elites (see Leach and Pelky 2001). In this study, we shift this focus to examine the beliefs and behavior of grassroots stakeholders, defined as the “appropriators” (Ostrom 1990) or the “consumers” (Lubell 2004) of natural resources and the formation of grassroots watershed organizations. We utilize the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), which has been fruitfully applied to research on watershed partnerships, and we attempt to adopt the appropriate elements of ACF in conjunction with conceptions of social identity to provide a framework for examining grassroots stakeholders and groups. This study focuses on one grassroots watershed group, which is made up of farmers, in a subwatershed in the Sugar Creek watershed in northeast Ohio, and uses data collected through three different methods to address some of the difficulties in understanding grassroots as opposed to grasstops stakeholders and organizations. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
watersh (121), farmer (101), grassroot (93), creek (83), sugar (82), farm (82), group (73), stakehold (72), ohio (57), research (55), social (48), manag (48), valu (47), stream (47), conserv (46), water (45), belief (42), partner (42), agricultur (39), communiti (39), studi (36), |
Author's Keywords:
|
watershed management, grassroots stakeholders, grassroots watershed groups |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Weaver, Mark., Moore, Richard. and Parker, Jason. "Understanding Grassroots Stakeholders and Grassroots Stakeholder Groups: The View from the Grassroots in the Upper Sugar Creek" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41675_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Weaver, M. R., Moore, R. and Parker, J. , 2005-09-01 "Understanding Grassroots Stakeholders and Grassroots Stakeholder Groups: The View from the Grassroots in the Upper Sugar Creek" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41675_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Although collaborative watershed management is increasingly accepted as the dominant paradigm in resource management and environmental policy, research on collaborative watershed organizations has largely ignored the attitudes and behaviors of grassroots stakeholders and the formation and organization of grassroots watershed groups. Instead, the research on collaborative watershed management has remained focused on the study of policy elites or “grasstops” (Graetz and Shapiro 2005) stakeholders, including “interest group leaders, elected officials, bureaucrats, and partnership staff” (Lubell 2004, 341) and on watershed partnerships, defined as a “collection of parties, usually featuring both private and governmental representatives…” (Kenny et al. 2000, quoted in Lubell, et al 2002), i.e. as collaborations among such policy elites (see Leach and Pelky 2001). In this study, we shift this focus to examine the beliefs and behavior of grassroots stakeholders, defined as the “appropriators” (Ostrom 1990) or the “consumers” (Lubell 2004) of natural resources and the formation of grassroots watershed organizations. We utilize the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), which has been fruitfully applied to research on watershed partnerships, and we attempt to adopt the appropriate elements of ACF in conjunction with conceptions of social identity to provide a framework for examining grassroots stakeholders and groups. This study focuses on one grassroots watershed group, which is made up of farmers, in a subwatershed in the Sugar Creek watershed in northeast Ohio, and uses data collected through three different methods to address some of the difficulties in understanding grassroots as opposed to grasstops stakeholders and organizations. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
28 |
| Word count: |
13505 |
| Text sample: |
| Understanding Grassroots Stakeholders and Grassroots Stakeholder Groups: The View from the Grassroots in the Upper Sugar Creek Mark Weaver Department of Political Science The College of Wooster Richard Moore Department of Human and Community Resource Development The Ohio State University Jason Parker Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology and Agroecosystems Management Program/OARDC Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Washington DC September 1-September 4 2005 Copyright by the American Political Science Association Please |
| 2004. Talking About Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identify in American Life. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press. Weaver Mark and Richard Moore. (2004) “Generating and Sustaining Collaborative Decision-Making in Watershed Groups.” Presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society August 11-15 Sacramento California. Williams Bruce and Albert Matheny. 1995. Democracy Dialogue and Environmental Disputes. New Haven: Yale University Press. Yin Robert K. 1998. “The Abridged Version of Case Study Research: Design and 25 Method.” In |
Similar Titles:
Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) Program – Sustaining Agriculture and Water Resources
Validation of Paired Watersheds for Assessing Conservation Practices in Upper Big Walnut Creek Watershed, Ohio
Effective Outreach for Wisconsin’s Women and Hispanic Farmers: Using Community Based Social Marketing for Research
|
|